Often intemperate and sometimes foam-flecked rants about politics, current events and popular culture by Perth blogger and very occasional standup Matt Hayden (obviously not the cricketer). Your problem if you can't spot the sit-down comedy.
I wrote earlier about how it's worth paying attention to the number of well known people who have gone out and been jabbed, and then report serious adverse reactions. Here's another example from the US.
The fact that someone as fit and strong as Oscar De La Hoya could end up in this situation is significant. The pro-vaxx crowd would see it as an illustration of how serious the 'rona situation actually is, of course. He'd be even sicker if he didn't get the jab, they'd say.
But that's irrational. How could you possibly know that? It's the kind of arse-about logic that has justified these destructive lockdowns.
"But think how much worse it would be!" That's so retarded. That's what Aztec high priests would say as they collected the kids to sacrifice to the weather gods. "We must do this or the crops will die!"
And when the crops died anyway? "Well, we all dodged a massive ... spear. The sacrifice stopped the frog plague as well, didn't it!"
But getting back to the poor bedridden boxer, it might just be that it was the "vaccine" itself that was to blame for his condition. Could this be a classic case of ADE? It's possible.
In any case, his plight punches a big fat hole in the case for jab mandates and vaccine passports.
Mark Levy is a passionate Aussie sports fan and broadcaster. He's taken the plunger, and expects everyone else to follow suit.
To him I'd say, no thanks. But he can have mine if he wants.
Actually, he's such a fan, he should even stock up on the stuff. That'll help take the weight off the public health system, won't it? Tears for Fears Chant even said everyone's gonna have to get boosters indefinitely anyway.
Of course he and most local blue checks don't understand why so many are avoiding the jab. These slebs were not elevated for their critical thinking abilities, after all.
In any case he's not nearly as fit as Oscar, which worries me. I hope it's not the case that things go pear shaped for him sometime down the track. But I suspect they might. That's because I think he was one of the blue checks who got the actual concoction injected, and not a placebo.
I believe many famous folk -- particularly those in the upper echelons -- have actually done the latter, which reflects very poorly on them.
On SkyNews recently Campbell Newman owned Stephen Conroy on the subject of vaccine passports. Conroy said that Newman didn't care about kids because the unjabbed might pass the 'rona onto them.
Newman rightly observed that so can the jabbed. It's well established that the vaccine (again, just using their term for convenience) doesn't stop transmission. So what's the effing point?
All the pro-jabbers can ever do is say, like Julia Gillard used to, "it's the right thing to do".
And why is that? Because feelings. It's basically all they've got.
It's like when they say "because science", but can't cite any specific studies or evidence. Everything is driven by their narcissistic sense of moral virtue.
Dictator Dan now wants to "lock out" the unvaccinated. It feels right to him. But this is of course clear discrimination, a fundamental violation of basic human rights. It's therefore illegal. But he doesn't give a shit.
As well as being emotionally committed to his position he knows that the vast majority of human rights activists and lawyers won't arc up about it, showing what frauds they are. Neither will anyone in the mainstream media.
As well as the illegality, think of the irrationality. He's not even talking about those who are known to be infected, just those who are mostly healthy and haven't submitted to the needle.
Anyway, even if they were all infected, why would they be a threat to the jabbed if it works? And if it doesn't work, then why even have it, let alone mandate it?
Justin Trudeau recently said that the government needed to "protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated". But isn't that what the vaxx is meant to do? Anyone who has even the slightest capacity for critical thought will see how absurd that statement is.
Yet not only are stupid globalist pollies and commentators pushing this line, it's the official position of public health systems across the globe. Doctors must promote it or be punished in various ways, including by being fired. So they obey.
It's amazing. This massive emotional component has long been clear in the global warming religion. But this is another level entirely.
And this time it's directly impacting everyone's lives. We're all suffering because of the lockdowns and other restrictions. And now there's this relentless pressure to undergo an untested and clearly ineffectual medical procedure -- that is causing an unheard of number of adverse reactions -- that makes no rational sense at all.
It's extremely ominous, yes. But ultimately I think it will work in our favour. If this doesn't wake up the compliant masses nothing will.
And they are waking up. The process has definitely started here in Australia. The harder these narcissistic control freaks push to implement their technocratic fascist agenda, the more people snap out of their slumber. What's going on in France will happen here for sure.
If you've ever looked at my YouTube channel, you'll know that I've done heaps of videos about the symbolic subtext of many stories in the MSM, the Daily Telegraphin particular.
The reason I focus on that paper is because it's cheap to buy and the imagery is easy to spot. In it, there are several recurring patterns related to how the photos and headlines are laid out on the page. Some of them are deeply sinister and they'll often take a symbol and play variations on it. I've described an example of this in the clip embedded at the end of this post.
Here's another case in point. It's from the day after ScoMo's laughable "V-Day" launch of the vaccine rollout. The very fact that he chose this analogy is a real rabbit hole in itself. Maybe I'll get around to explaining what I mean by that in another post. But for now, I'll just focus on one aspect of the story on the day.
As you may recall, Jane Malysiak was the first recipient of the vaccine rollout. This was the cover on February 23.
I found it fascinating that she was described as a "vaccination heroine". Such an interesting use of words ... If you remove the last letter from "heroine" what have you got? Heroin, the drug. And how is it most commonly administered? By syringe, of course.
So, the symbolism seemed to imply that vaccination was a kind of addictive opiate as much as anything else. As we all know, addicts frequently die from overdoses.
I know some people would think I'm reading way too much into this one little aspect of the cover story. But given how often these involve hidden meanings, often of a malicious nature, I think the interpretation is valid.
Above is another, more recent example of this association (August 16). The term "hillbilly heroin" refers to prescription opioids such as Ocycodone that can give the user a cheap, legal high. The story describes how 12 Aussies die every week as a result of overdosing on drugs like this.
Directly below the item is an ad encouraging people to go out and get vaccinated. What are the odds?
Also, at the top of the page is a story about how chimps and bonobos have a kind of etiquette that they observe in social interactions. So the article is specifically equating people and primates.
Now this may be a stretch but again it's possible because of the pattern of symbolic association the paper employs so often: What do privileged "city slickers" think of "hillbillies" ("bogans" in local parlance)? That they're subhuman, not unlike apes and monkeys.
Add to this the fact that the global jab campaign is basically a massive ongoing experiment. Greg Hunt is actually on record saying that the vaccine rollout here is part of the world's largest clinical trial.
And what species is often used in animal trials? The chimpanzee.
See the subtext? It's basically mocking the jabbed. It's saying: "You're just a bunch of lowlife apes being used in a medical experiment, and some of you are gonna die. But you'll do it, because we've got you brainwashed."
It's now completely obvious that all mainstream media outlets right across the board are ultimately owned and/or controlled by the globalist elite and will continue to serve their interests come hell or high water. They bitch and fight amongst each other but it's just a Punch and Judy show, not unlike what happens in Canberra with the pollies.
It's basically meant to distract us from what the puppeteers are up to. It's also part of an ongoing "divide and conquer" strategy. If righties and lefties are always shouting at each other they're all ultimately easier to control.
You see this dynamic all the time. And here's a specific example of it.
In yesterday's Daily Telegraph former editor David Penberthy threw shade on their ABC's Four Corners program for their two part investigation into Trump's "big lie" that he was robbed in the 2020 election. A key element of that "expose" was about how eeevil Rupert's Fox News aided and abetted the Bad Orange Man in promoting this grand deception.
Penbo was miffed by that accusation, given that he's long worked for outlets owned by the same parent company. So he defended his employer in the column.
But he didn't disagree with the foundational claim of the Four Corners series, which was that Joe Biden's win was totes legit! And he threw in some mockery of DJT for good measure.
This seems to be a requirement for almost everyone working in the MSM these days. A severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome is preferred. But at the very least you must agree that The Donald is a bloviating narcissist who can't be trusted on anything much.
This phenomenon was also on display in Andrew Bolt's column in the Daily Telegraph on the same subject. He bashed Four Corners in a similar way, also observing that Trump's claims of fraud were themselves false. The point was made almost as an aside, but it was still there.
Wonder what's gonna happen to all of these guys and their reputations if and when it is proven that Trump was right after all?
Next few months are gonna be really interesting, I reckon ...
If you're not convinced that the utterly corrupt globalist-controlled political establishment -- with the enthusiastic complicity of the mainstream media -- have pretty much inverted reality then check this out.
So the coppers are swaggering around Sydney and Melbourne, brutally arresting people for chatting together in parks. But they're not remotely fascist. No, they're the good guys!
Not only that, but those understandably alarmed by these tactics used by narcissistic premiers without any scientific justification whatsoever, and who exercise their basic human right to make their opinions publicly known are deemed to be the real Nazis!
Makes you wonder how people could end up with such a twisted view of reality. Obviously many factors are involved. But the mind control power of Hollywood is a big one in many cases.
It's not just the movie themes that have such an effect. It's also the perceived authority that these world famous stars possess.
Big Arnie is a perfect example of this. Below he's using one of his iconic lines from his role as the Terminator. But now it's just after he's had the jab -- or has he? So ironic given that he himself is the son of a literal Nazi.
Fascinating how the daily pressers of Gladys Kevorkian, Dictator Dan et al are all about those scary case numbers. But as we all know a "case" doesn't necessarily mean that the person is actually symptomatic. It's not even certain that they've been exposed to the dreaded 'rona itself, since it's well established that the PCR test cannot sufficiently distinguish between COVID and other viruses like the flu. That's one of the main reasons it's being dumped at the end of the year.
We tend to learn nothing more about these poor victims of this pandemic other than the numbers. Every now and then a death is announced. As details emerge, we usually discover that it was much more likely to do with other conditions.
Regardless, blue check pollies and MSM journos continue to fan the flames of fear of the 'rona, stressing that vaccination is our only way out of this hellscape. It's not perfect, but it's the best shot we have!
Then you see that there are actually numerous members of these same cohorts that have had very bad reactions to the jabs themselves. Unlike with the 'rona stats, the identities of these victims are confirmed. In some cases, their faces are recognizable to millions of us.
Remember, politics and media are elitist institutions employing a tiny percentage of the workforce. Really puts things in perspective, dunnit?
Channel Seven journalist Denham Hitchcock is the latest of these.
In his Insta post, he actually says that "one hospital had well over a dozen cases like me".
Georgia Clark, who works for the Daily Telegraph, had a serious reaction after Pfizer. Like so many pro-jab folk, her bad experience seems only to have increased her fervour for this untested medical procedure.
I feel sorry for all these people. It seems they've had enormous pressure placed upon them to go out and get vaccinated, as well as write pieces zealously exhorting all Aussies to do the same.
But the absurd irony of their plight is undeniable. Above is her story about the massive anti-lockdown protest on July 24.
That dude may have been brutally arrested. But he didn't wind up in hospital from taking a medicine that he never needed in the first place.
That's what's so sad about all of this. The suffering of all these people could have been completely avoided. And they were never at any real risk of death or serious illness from the 'rona in any case.
Sue Dunlevy also writes for Rupert's Sydney daily. She described "horrendous" post inoculation symptoms, but remained fervently pro-jab.
Nathan Vass is another of the paper's reporters and he went through even worse. I describe his ordeal in the video embedded at the bottom of this post.
So, that's three serious adverse reactions in the same workplace! And those are just the ones that I've read about because they involved journalists.
Dennis Freedman is a blue check cricket journo.
He was a young, active, healthy bloke. Then he took the shot ...
NSW MP Victor Dominello was stricken with Bell's Palsy. And yes, he also had the jab.
Fascinating that while this very striking condition was reported in the MSM, the possibility that it was linked to his vaccination has been either avoided, or played down.
So, it looks like two high profile pollies wound up with the same condition at the same time. What are the odds of that?
If you conclude that the jab was to blame in both cases you're not some batshit conspiracy theorist. It's the most rational explanation given the context.
Says so much that pollies and MSM figures are so reluctant to do this. They, like Dominello himself, are completely one-eyed on the matter.
The question is why? Who is ultimately behind this relentless global campaign to stick needles into everyone on the planet? And how do they have so much power over the minds of all these high profile, influential figures?
It's beyond obvious that we are now in the midst of a ferocious worldwide mind war. The globalist elite are waging it on us and they're even using our own armed forces in their campaigns.
Those at the very top of this power pyramid are truly evil people. I think many are driven by a bizarre ancient death cult, TBH.
As well as being narcissistic control freaks they seem to see themselves as artists, viewing the globe as their canvas and humanity as the paint. And art is full of symbolism as we all know. That's why you see so much of it in the mainstream media (MSM), which they ultimately own and use for the purpose of mass mind control.
They also like to tell us what they're up to in an oblique way because that's just the kind of sadistic scumbags they are. Also, they believe that if we don't call them out on this everything that results from their actions is our fault.
The best place to spot these sinister patterns of imagery locally seems to be in the pages of the Daily Telegraph. It's chockas with the stuff! Blue dogs, Masonic black and white, shoe symbolism and the like ... You'll see several examples in every issue.
One of the dominant recurring patterns has a definite rock spider vibe. A recent issue (July 28) is a good example of what I mean.
It was during the Olympics and featured a spread about gold medalist Kaylee McKeown. It described the touching story of how she dedicated her win to her beloved late father, whom she found so inspiring.
Now, I'm not saying that the story is insinuating something about the swimmer herself. Rather, it is using her dramatic win and its emotive context as a vehicle for what is best described as symbolic incantation.
That's why the inclusion of this photo is significant IMO. It's just a cool hand gesture that a lot of millenials use. But it's also reminiscent of "El Diablo".
Another favourite is the V-sign. ScoMo and other globalist-controlled pollies have been using it a lot lately in relation to this vaccine rollout. You see it often in the MSM, the Daily Telegraphin particular.
The swimmer has a tattoo on her right foot that reads "I'll always be with you". This is a memorable sign of love for her dad. It also makes for a striking image. So, it's understandable why it's included in the story.
But the photo is also highly symbolic. The occult elite love to use feet, shoes and boots in their imagery. Feet have "souls", remember.
This is a photo from the same issue. Note how the model has her right shoe sole exposed. They love that particular pose. You see it all the time.
The brand she's wearing is Nike. The well known catchphrase "just do it" is reminiscent of "do what thou wilt". And Nike is the goddess of (V-for) victory. So there's no wonder it's an occult elite fave.
Above is another example of this motif from a recent issue. I've seen it used too many times in the newspaper for it to be there by chance -- well, not solely anyway (nyuck, nyuck).
Back to the 28 July issue. Look at the two pages above. There's a feature about "retro parenting" right next to the regular history page.
Hmm. Interesting thematic link, there, eh?
The historical feature is about Walt Disney's obsession with a British girl who voiced the eponymous heroine in his cartoon version of Alice in Wonderland.
Creepy globalist occultists love this tale (along with The Wizard of Oz) and there are plenty of rabbit holes to do with it, that's for sure. (Not surprisingly, Dictator Dan is a fan.) The same applies to Disney himself, who was a major secret society wanker among many other things.
The headline refers to the girl's dad. And her director Walt -- who is old enough to be her father -- is making her blush. Also, note the word "Oxford" in the headline. This is an interesting choice with Astrazenca now being in the news all the time.
Look how he's holding her right foot. Again, the sole is exposed.
This is still the same issue, remember. What are the odds?
Starting to get a sense of what these patterns of imagery, along with the headlines, are being used to invoke?
Creeped out yet? I'd be surprised if you're not, TBH ...
Now check out that adjacent story:
The headline describes an "old fashioned approach" next to the history page showing a handsy occultist with a young girl. And what's the subject? "Child rearing."
Hmm. Could this possibly have a double meaning, d'you reckon?
Normally I'd say no. But given the context ...
The photo includes a cute pooch. The kids around it are all wearing blue jeans. Looks to me like another blue dog.
There seems to be at least one of these in most issues. Sometimes there are several.
Here's the spread referred to on the cover. If you still can't see there's something sinister going on, then the layout may yet convince you.
Look at the ad for Wesley Mission on the bottom of the left hand page. The story headline above reads "Bubba does it". The ad includes the line "every child can be loved" along with a photo of a little girl.
And what's the ad underneath the same story on the other side with the rest of the headline ("for Dad"). Why, it's one for GoDaddy!
Well, fancy that. What an amazing coincidence ... not.
Granted, this pattern could be seen as benign if it were just a one off. But in the context of all the other stuff in this issue, and many others? I don't think so ...
Just on the placement of advertising blocks to create hidden meaning: They do this all the time. Above you can see the very same GoDaddy promotion underneath a feature about the passing of businessman John Cornell, best known as Hoges' mate Strop.
See how the ad is placed underneath the page that features a photo of him with his kids. And there's great attention to detail. The photo is directly above the brand name.
And right above the other part of the ad reading "dream it, build it" (a concept with strong Masonic vibes) is a photo of Strop in that characteristic pose. Again it features his right foot, with sole exposed. It's clearly not an accident. (Also, it's in black and white. Secret society wankers love this "duality" motif).
Again, I'm not saying they're making any commentary on this guy specifically. It's the symbolism that's key.
So, you can see they're always choosing words and images very carefully to convey hidden meanings to "those in the know". It's not about the content of stories. It's about the juxtaposition of words and images on the pages to convey double meanings.
With this in mind look at these examples.
What should be "tried"? The protest itself, or a "family affair"?
Hand what in? The guns or the teens?
And if you're still not convinced this is intentional then look at this example from July 16. The story on the right hand side is about two pygmy marmosets at Taronga Zoo. They are basking in the glow of a heat lamp.
Occultists love this kind of image. It could be seen to suggest the corona under which we all live now. And who is "the bringer of light"?
But look specifically at how the two critters in the story correspond to the two figures in the ad directly below it.
Even their eyelines correspond to some degree. In both the ad and the story the figure on the left is looking at the one on the right. So they are being equated, clearly.
Now look at the caption in the zoo story and transpose it onto the ad, remembering that it features an adult and a child.
Then look at the exhortation in the ad. What's one of the main "laws" of nature? "Do what thou wilt."
Again there is absolutely no way that those images and words are in that conformation purely by chance. They have been painstakingly put together on the page to convey a subtextual meaning to a select audience (who no doubt get a "duper's delight" high out of the fact that the vast majority of readers are completely oblivious to it).
I could go on and on in this vein. Every issue of this paper is littered with this kind of stuff.
But please, if you're still not convinced that there's something deeply sinister going on then check out the video embedded at the bottom of this post. I made this when I first started to notice these creepy phenomena. It refers to a recurring symbolic pattern that included kids, dogs and road transport -- cars mostly.
Lately, that seems to have waned somewhat. Now, it's more about planes.
But just to show you how often this appears, and how widespread it is, the above tweet just popped up in my feed. Blue dog, in a car, with a reference to "grooming".
More "dog comms" or nah, d'ya reckon? I know what I think ...
Now what I've outlined in this post suggests there's something insane and evil regularly being alluded to in plain sight in MSM outlets seen by millions each day. The ramifications of that make me wanna throw up, for obvious reasons.
You'll understand why I really don't want to be right on this. But I think I am.
I do welcome criticism of the above speculation. But if you're just gonna say I've got my tin-foil hat on, that's not good enough. There are definite, undeniable patterns here. If you wanna "debunk" my "batshit crazy conspiracy theory" about what they imply then you have to offer a benign alternative explanation for them.
In any case, I hope you have found this blog post, er, illuminating.
