Sunday, November 17, 2019

MSM dutifully pedals globalist, PC line re Branson, Downer

Right from the start I sensed there was something dodgy about the Australian MSM's coordinated campaign promoting press freedom and the public's right to know. It seemed much more like a massive "cover their arse" file for when Trump, Barr and Durham finally nuke The Swamp and the globalist Cabal and the normies collectively wake up to just how much evil shit the world's elites have been getting away with for yonks, then demand to know why they weren't told about it.

Look at how they've dragged their feet on Epstein. Sure, 60 Minutes finally did a pretty good expose on what the scumbag was up to and the horrendous damage he's caused. But they still refused to cover the Billary angle which was obviously the elephant in the room -- or should I say, "the owl on the island"

Virginia Giuffre has been living in Queensland for years. So there's long been an Aussie angle on this. Yet until very recently there have been only one or two brief stories about her. Also, Katherine Keating, daughter of Paul, was filmed leaving the billionaire's apartment (intriguingly, this footage was included in Tara Brown's segment but without mention of her name AFAIK). Of course her presence may have been completely benign, but it's still a massive story no matter how you look at it. Why haven't Australia's top investigative journalists been covering this in detail since the Daily Mail (a foreign outfit) broke the story, or even before? Surely this is something the Australian public has a right to know all about.

Clearly our MSM big wigs disagree. Aside from a coupla articles like this one, there's very little about it in the big local outlets. (Citizen journalists, anons and weaponized autists have been doing bulk online research, however. As is the case with most issues these days, they're completely outclassing the mainstream media with their digs, even with the meagre resources they have. My advice to News, Nine, the ABC et al: Catch up, kids, before it's too late! Once you lose your audience to passionate, capable amateurs they're gone forever. You're right at the cusp of that now even though you don't know it.)

But back to the "Right To Know" campaign specifically: Check out this piece in last Friday's Daily Telegraph:

FFS, how pathetic is that? Richard Branson is desperate to be associated with the noble cause of press freedom, and the Sydney paper reckons this is "news". They've even included their slick little campaign branding symbol with the redacted text. He's obviously tryna make himself look like he's one of the good guys opposed to sneaky, secretive government meanies. 

To put it bluntly this is just balls out PR and it shows what utter bollocks the whole "press freedom" campaign actually is. If News Corp were genuinely interested in the public's right to know about Branson, they would be doing much more investigation into issues like how NXIVM -- y'know, that creepy chick-branding sex cult run by evil child trafficking rock spider Keith Raniere -- held functions on Branson's Necker Island. Did Sir Dick know what kind of dregs he was associating with?

The Murdoch papers weren't the only ones helping the Brit billionaire portray himself as a mega-woke dude who dinkum cares heaps about democracy an' stuff. The SMH ran a puff piece so painfully right-on that even simpering soyboy Adam Bandt tweeted it!

Gawd but Branson is brazen, eh? He runs an international airline, which has an absolutely yuge carbon footprint, and he has the gall to lecture us on coal. If he truly believed in AGW theory and cared about the environment he wouldn't even be in that industry to start with. 

Looks to me like he might just be anticipating some less than edifying revelations about himself or his associates in the future, and he's tryna pre-emptively counter them by portraying himself in a positive light. The MSM, being tools of the globalist mega-rich and powerful rather than those who speak truth to them, are happy to indulge the cashed up Limey with the shit-eating grin.

So-called journos at their ABC have also been poncing about proclaiming their passion for press freedom and the public's right to know. Of course they're all PC lefties from way back even though they claim to be fair and balanced, the lying cowards. But given where their political passions clearly lie, you'd think they'd be dragging an ol' Tory blue blood like Alexander Downer over hot solar panels re his involvement in this Spygate stuff, wouldn't you? But nup, they've been sucking up to him big time.

They've even featured him as a panellist on their flagship lunar wankfest The Drum, an absolutely fascinating move given the context. When was the last time he appeared on it, if at all? Did they ask him about his recent interview with John Durham or even allude to the reasons for it? Not likely! IMHO they're tryna burnish his image as an elder statesmen and thereby make George Papadopoulos's claims seem extra-implausible.

As you'd expect of a Liberal Party icon, Lexie was poo-pooing the Democrats and their impeachment circus, thereby implicitly siding with the Trump Whitehouse.

Subliminal message seems to be: "See, Downer is right-wing, conservative! There's no way such a rusted-on Tory would be 'Clinton's errand boy' like that awful Trump errand boy George has been claiming, now would he?"

But that narrative depends on the ol' ideological right-left binary. And ever since Trump burst onto the stage, that just doesn't cut it anymore. Millions of people are waking up to the realization that the big battle is now between nationalism and globalism; between ethical patriots and an utterly corrupt globalist Cabal. 

The local mainstream media are merely the collective cat's paw of these despicable elites, as are members of the political establishment in Canberra and the rest of the Anglosphere. Sure, they're not evil people themselves, but they have long been controlled by those who most definitely are.

My advice to anyone working in the Aussie MSM who calls himself a "journalist": We can all see what's going on. You can't fool us anymore. Your authority, which you never deserved anyhow, is collapsing by the day.

If you know anything at all about the diabolical, treasonous shit that Trump claims has been carried out in this international coup being waged against him, or anything related to elite pedophilia (Epstein-linked or not) then start aggressively investigating and reporting it, pronto!

If your editorial overlords won't let you do this then that's a story in itself, innit? And we definitely have a right to know about that, too.

So, instead of being an Aussie version of Amy Robach, you could even be a dinkum whistleblower. We'd be completely convinced you genuinely believed in press freedom, then.

(Apart from anything else there's been waaay too much recent "reporting" about a fake one. And a change is as good as a rest, as the saying goes ...)

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Jordan Steele-John calls opponents "arsonists" and lefties cheer

Oh, FFS. Twitter lefties are jumping up and down, flinging poo and hooting up a storm like howler monkeys at feeding time in the zoo because Jordan Steele-John called Labor and Coalition senators "arsonists". Yet it's the Greens' own policies that result in massive ground fuel build up, thereby ensuring that when fires do happen they are far more intense and widespread than if the responsible burn offs of yore had been implemented.

Also, the deep green hypocrisy is amazing given that fellow traveller Nayuka Gorrie said "let's burn stuff" on Q and A just recently. Not only did the leftist trollective not condemn her; they loved what she said.

Then there's Media Watch: Cadaverous finger-wagger and massive twat Paul Barry scolded KAK et al for obvious jokes about running down Extinction Rebellion protestors, grimly warning that someone might take them seriously:

I think it’s time they got some new material and perhaps stopped making jokes about killing protesters. Because some nutter out there might just take them up on it.

But when it came to Gorrie's incendiary exhortation he said nothing of the sort. Just praised her and her fellow "fiery feminists" for their narcissistic idiocy and misandrist malice, characterizing their obnoxious whingefest as "compelling" and "confronting". FFS, what a despicable display of supine, soy-soaked suckage.

Why do we have to pay for these toxic, parasitic arsehats? The sooner we privatize the ABC, the better.

More thoughts:

Monday, November 4, 2019

MSM on the way out whether the Storm hits suddenly or not ...

It's revealing that so many so-called journalists in the Australian MSM don't have a clue about QAnon. If they do "report" on it at all, they just rehash the inaccurate description that their counterparts in the USA are peddling. After all, the big outlets here are merely a subset of the US-based legacy media, echoing its style and content. Like CNN, MSNBC et al they are controlled by the same globalist, Trump-hating, Swamp-dwelling forces -- which is why their claims to care about our "right to know" seem so suss.

They are terrified of QAnon and describe it as a "conspiracy cult", "conspiracy movement", and often just a "conspiracy theory". This is clearly to evoke a powerful emotional reaction in their audience and make them conclude it's full of Bible-thumping racist rednecks and anti-Semitic whackos and is therefore best avoided.

While some conspiracy theories have gathered momentum in the movement they comprise just one aspect of it. In any case, the MSM have been pushing the biggest conspiracy theory of all for years now: the Russian collusion delusion.

The QAnon phenomenon is an alternative to the mainstream media more than anything else. And while the MSM declares itself to be the ultimate authority and speaks down to people, demanding that they accept its version of events without thought or question, Q encourages everyone to think for themselves, and do their own research. It looks extremely likely that Q is dinkum and Trump is part of the whole plan, something numerous high profile "journalists" imply or flat out state is impossible. Yet they refuse to confirm this view by asking him directly -- which is extremely telling in itself.

A while back Trump himself said: "We have to bypass the media in order to get straight to the people ... We've gone around them like no one in history has gone around them."

I think he was referring to this whole project that, along with other methods, will help bring in a massive "storm" of retributive justice against the globalist cabal in general and the dirty Dems in particular. And it's all arcing up again big time now that 8chan -- where Q posted previously -- has been resurrected as 8kun.

It's been up less than a day but apparently Q has already started posting there again. 

Also, a high profile Twitter user and Q follower and decoder called JoeM has just abruptly quit the platform. He said this was because his profile had become too big and was therefore a distraction. The movement was all about giving power back to the anons, after all.

Maybe, but I suspect he may have been closer to the whole operation than he claimed, and his stepping back from social media signals the next phase in it; that as his very handle stated the "StormIsUponUs".

After 93 days of continuous work by highly skilled tech-heads passionately committed to free speech, 8kun is now up and running and will be much harder to knock offline than its predecessor was.

It's likely that this will function as an online repository for all kinds of jaw-dropping evidence of the globalist cabal's criminality. As the 2020 election approaches the legacy media's credibility will continue to plunge and more and more people will hear about 8kun. After visiting the site -- or, more likely, seeing its updates elsewhere online -- they'll become red-pilled as a result.

Many Q followers anticipate that Trump's counterattack against the globalists will result in a sudden, spectacular "storm" of mass arrests and subsequent military trials. I doubt it will be that explosive. I think this will be a gradual process so that the normies can slowly adjust to the new reality and thereby come to terms with the fact that they have been massively lied to for decades by high profile figures and institutions they long admired and trusted. 

Either way, the MSM in the USA and here in Australia are toast. They just don't know it yet.

I don't feel sorry for them, but I do pity the millions of poor normies who have built their world-view around a massively fraudulent narrative about the world pedalled by psychopathic scumbags. I suspect that this "great awakening" will shake many of them to the core and some may even slowly go mad as a result.

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

The New World Order really is a thing!

It always cracks me up that lefties sneer at those who believe that many powerful, rich elites and international socialists have long been working towards the creation of a centralized global government or "New World Order". The right-on line is that this is a deranged conspiracy theory pushed by swivel-eyed truthers.

But it's pretty obvious that PC lefties wanna erode sovereignty and absorb nations into a larger economic, cultural and governmental system that they control completely. Look at the EU and the UN. If they are not precursors to one world government -- that is, a New World Order -- I dunno what are. Anyway, there have been numerous well known people who have openly used the term over many decades.

I've become fascinated by this whole concept lately, which is why I found it amusing to see the term being used on the front page of The Australian recently. 

This was referring to the theme of Scott Morrison's Lowy Lecture the day before. This was pretty ironic because ScoMo was describing a policy direction that was more nationalistic and veered away from the New World Order. If anything, his speech signalled a return to an older one (and a good thing too).

This shift clearly had much to do with Trump's influence, which was upsetting to the socialists at The Guardian.

Morrison’s insistence “Australia’s international engagement will be squarely driven by Australia’s national interests” is unremarkable language for any leader.

Channelling John Howard, he cast this as a forthright but co-operative independence: “We will decide our interests and the circumstances in which we seek to pursue them.”

But what followed – condemning “a new variant of globalism that seeks to elevate global institutions above the authority of nation states to direct national policies” – echoed not only Trump, but Brexit figures such as Nigel Farage in form.

“We should avoid any reflex towards a negative globalism that coercively seeks to impose a mandate from an often ill-defined borderless global community and, worse still, an unaccountable internationalist bureaucracy,” he said.

“Only a national government, especially one accountable through the ballot box and the rule of law, can define its national interests. We can never answer to a higher authority.”

Notably, other MSM outlets fixated on this particular part of his speech. Being tools of globalist elites themselves, they don't like this at all.

But it's a really good sign for Australians generally. ScoMo was elected in major part because he was more of a nationalist than Shorten. And the fact that he's shown himself to be such a solid supporter of Trump is very heartening. Bolshie butthurt about it is better still!

Saturday, October 26, 2019

MSM's claims that they care about our "right to know" ring very hollow

This weird press freedom campaign keeps going right across the MSM. There are stories in News Ltd dailies with a kinda logo that includes redacted text. It's all very slick and well thought out. There's even a dedicated website for it. 

All the mainstream outlets are part of this and it is clearly meant to make the Government look furtive and sneaky. Odd to see all the TV, radio and newspapers so unified since they are often sniping at each other over various issues. Why have they buried the hatchet?

And think about the wider context: For years now Trump has been complaining that the Russian collusion narrative is a "witch hunt". And he's recently been claiming that the Dems are actually attempting a coup. The Whitehouse is now going on the offensive, with the declassification of what are reputed to be bombshell reports imminent. In the last coupla days the DOJ has made the inquiry into the origins of the Russia collusion narrative a criminal investigation.

And remember, there's a significant local link to all this. George Papadopoulos has long claimed that Alexander Downer -- whom he calls "Clinton's errand boy" -- spied on him at the behest of the Deep State.

Yet there seems to be no mention of this at all in the "Your Right to Know" campaign. Sure, press freedom is vital. And of course issues like those listed below are important. But there's definitely an elephant in the room here. It's from Adelaide, talks with a plum in its mouth, and has been known to wear fishnets.

"Your Right to Know" looks very much like insurance for when the shit hits the fan. The MSM seem to be desperately tryna brainwash the normies into blaming the Government and not them for keeping Aussies in the dark over this. They (pre-emptively) doth protest too much, methinks.

And let's face it, they must've known heaps about this, and for a long time. Remember that politics is showbiz for ugly people. And Canberra, like Hollywood, is a hotbed for gossip. 

Everybody in Tinsel Town effing knew about Harvey Weinstein. So surely everyone -- pollies, journos, the lot -- must've heard rumours of Australian involvement in the plot to derail Trump's run for President. Even if they were unfounded, surely they were newsworthy. So why have we only heard about all this recently?

This is a good Twitter thread on this theme.

BTW, that guy, Dr Russell McGregor, had his career as a shrink nuked because he was posting about this whole QAnon phenomenon. The Medical Council of NSW said it was a "paranoid conspiracy theory". So ironic because if anything deserves that label it's the MSM's official "Vlad the Imposter" line. Yet it's so obviously BS on stilts! (I talk about this in the second half of this video. Please check it out.)

You'd think that such an extreme, official reaction against one highly qualified professional over what he posted online would be newsworthy in itself. Yet AFAIK Dr McGregor's plight has not been reported at all in the MSM. Weird, eh? 

There are other aspects to this whole "press freedom" campaign that make it seem so suss. Thoughts on these here: 

Monday, October 21, 2019

MSM's concerted "press freedom" campaign seems suss somehow ...

I'm all for press freedom and I firmly believe in the public's right to know. But this massive, coordinated campaign by pretty much every mainstream media outlet in Oz has my spidey senses going right off!

It's so highly coordinated, and conformist in its expression it's alarming. It looks like they all got a memo from MEAA or something ...

Fact that Labor are joining them in solidarity is just laughable. This is the same party that, under Julia Gillard, put extreme pressure on News Ltd, resulting in Glenn Milne getting his career nuked. Broadcaster Michael Smith was also permanently punted because he was practising real investigative journalism re Gillard's dodgy history. (And he, unlike pretty much every one of his still employed former peers, has doggedly pursued the story since. Then there's all the Clinton Foundation stuff he's looked into; stuff that the rest of the MSM seems to have studiously avoided. Reflects on the profession just as badly as Labor joining the pile on.)

Also, remember that creepy Stalinist plan Labor had to censor the blogosphere? I recall them wanting to monitor everything online for badthink, and they were even talking about bloggers needing licences ... And wasn't that Jonathan Lea dude punted just recently for asking Shorten a difficult question?

Shouldn't dinkum truth seekers be mocking Hot Albo, Mark Dreyfus, Kristina Keneally et al for their shameless opportunism and hilarious hypocrisy, instead of all holding up their identical "redacted" papers in exactly the same pompous, po-faced manner and looking like totally lockstep, hive-mind, robodolt twats.

Cop an optic of the Ultimo Ken Doll below, with his fellow activists posing as journalists. This photo cracks me up!

Gawd. Gotta be the first time that these socialist snowflakes held eeevil Rupert's rags in an approving way. They'll prolly all frantically rush off to bathrooms to wash their hands yelling: "Eeeek! Eeeek! Unclean!" Rowland himself looks like he's just about to barf. What a laugh!

They look like a pack of zombies, a more sombre version of Extinction Rebellion, whose batshit antics they've been shamelessly promoting BTW. In the same way that those feral loons all claim to be raising awareness about "the science" of climate change but are actually just muppets mind-controlled by globalist elites, these clowns purport to be standing up for journalistic principles, but are actually mere political pawns being moved across a chessboard. 

I mean, if they are dinkum journos interested in the free exchange of ideas why do they all pedal this crap about climate change skeptics being "denialists", and still tragically cling to the "Vlad the Imposter" conspiracy theory, among many other things?

And check out the shot below of their ABC staffers from the mild West. Do you think Gillian OShaughnessy and her ilk are against the chillingly censorious 18C legislation? Odds are they support it -- enthusiastically. Bet they're all on same page when it comes to SSM, gender fluidity, feminism, multiculti etc., too ...

These woke folk are much closer to being thought police than anything else. For them to claim they are free speech champions is just a big fat fricken lie!

And boy do they ever look like a sad bunch of bolshie bozos (and bozettes). Not an original thought among them ... FFS, one of them's even wearing a fricken dunce cap! How apt.

If these people actually pursued the truth instead of relentlessly pedalling the bollocks PC narrative, I'd believe this campaign was a principled stand. But nup. Looks much more like (crap) political theatre to me.

So ... what's the real agenda behind it? Thoughts on what that might actually be below:

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Based KAK provokes pack attack

While their ABC is the worst outlet for politically correct group think, the rest of the MSM is almost as bad. Commercial TV is chockas with hand-wringing, virtue signalling arsehats all toeing the globalist, warmist line. That's why I'm so glad there are people like Kerri-Anne Kennerley still working in it. She definitely possesses common sense and the courage to express it in very blunt terms. Maybe that is because of all the struggles she's had during her very long career.

Recently, on Studio Ten, she had this to say about the Extinction Rebellion protestors: 

Personally, I would leave them all super glued to wherever they do it, the guy hanging from the Story Bridge. Why send emergency services? Leave him there until he gets himself out… no emergency services should help them, nobody should do anything, and you just put little witches hats around them, or use them as a speedbump.

I can imagine that the vast majority of normies watching the show heartily agreed with that sentiment. The XR protestors are just parasitic narcissists causing chaos. They aren't doing any good at all.

But KAK's spray seems to have been the only one of its kind in the entire MSM. She has been roundly condemned for the comments by many of her peers. And of course the Twitter trollective lost their shit big time over it. 

Revealing to see how many misogynistic insults were used against her from those caring, sharing, feminist lefties ... You can be damn sure that many of those getting stuck in with the "dumb blonde" angle re Kerri-Anne would be appalled if those same insults were hurled at that other blonde "KK", Kristina Keneally. Most of the blokes among this mob would be white-knighting up a storm!

Says so much that Tony Windsor not only tweeted something so malicious and puerile, but happily left it up on the site. It shows that he knows he won't be held to the same standard that those sledging a prominent feminist woman would be.

Windsor has been a frequent guest on that excruciating right-on jawfest The Drum. Imagine if he'd tweeted something along the same lines about Ms Keneally. He'd be permabanned in a microsecond without a doubt! But because he's attacked a safe target he's almost certain to be on there bloviating up a storm again before long.

Speaking of The Drum, and its preferred narrative: Claire Harvey demonstrates how to condemn the protestors while still obeying the warmist, globalist line and thereby not risk being punted from future panels. 

See, you can criticize the methods by which those hordes of shrieking, insane twats aimed to "raise awareness of climate change" and "help save the planet". But you must do it in a very mild, polite manner (unlike KAK). And you better not question their agenda itself. That is wrongthink. And it is verboten!

Clearly, almost everyone in the MSM has received this memo in one form or another and they obey it whenever the topic is discussed. This is extremely annoying. But it's also toxic to social cohesion and public mental health among other things.

Be great if the MSM stopped running the line that the narcissistic ferals have admirable goals. FFS, they are just useful idiots!