Monday, July 15, 2019

The Sauce: Hot Albo way cooler than Latho's crass conservatives!

I have blogged before about how News Ltd has a range of views, even though all the whining lefties at their ABC and Fairfax (now Nine) see it as HQ for eeevil righties. And here's another example of this:

In the Sunday Telegraph there was this item in "The Sauce" about an event held recently in Enmore that featured Anthony Albanese.

Using wordplay on "spinning" it described how Hot Albo carried off a DJ gig with aplomb. 

Kinda ironic, since the report itself was spin. It was clearly meant to humanize the Labor Leader by portraying him as hip to the yoof and all that. 

This was in marked contrast to the report further down the page. It was about an upcoming Liberty Works talkfest that Mark Latham will be attending. It included a coupla sneering references to the high profile guests, including Raheem Kassam, mentioning that "he was forced to apologize to a female minister who had recently suffered a miscarriage".

Now, you can always find some dirt about any well known person if you look hard enough. So why did they do so here unless they were very keen to peddle the dreary narrative about how conservatives are all such awful misogynists and the like?

And the piece concluded by saying the event "promises to be anything but boring". That's PC leftie code for "offensive, appalling and wrong".

The right-on bias is just excruciating, innit?

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

MSM smokescreen envelops Epstein

The Jeffrey Epstein arrest is absolutely yuge in so many ways. The scumbag rock spider is connected to numerous powerful pollies, squillionaires and slebs. They are all surely packin' their dacks, and bigly!

The story is more relevant to Americans than Australians for obvious reasons. Still, it's a massive development given the context of Trump's war against the globalist cabal and the deep state. If the local MSM were dinkum non-biased truth seekers it would still be one of the top stories here, with many details included.

But all I saw yesterday in the main two dailies (Daily Tele and Herald) were brief items on pages 19 and 20 respectively. Below is the one from the former.

As you can see it mentions Bill Clinton and Trump together as pals of the pedophile. It makes their links to him seem equivalent. But this is not the case at all.

Slick Willy has long been much more closely involved with Epstein, and has lobbed at his creepy "Orgy Island" dozens of times over the years. Trump, OTOH has never been there, and while he knew the guy he actually banned him from one of his resorts because of his creepy sexual predation of young girls.

But you can be sure that right across the spectrum the local MSM will maintain the false equivalence for as long as they can. That's because the same factors that cause a preponderence of fake news in the USA are at play here too, just not as pronounced. 

Below is a much more accurate depiction of what's going on. 

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

So only PC LGBTQIA+ folk can cry "homophobia"? Sounds like discrimination to me!

Something that becomes clearer with every passing day is how divisive and toxic political correctness is. And the reason it has this effect is not because of an excess of zeal -- you know, pathway to hell, etc -- but because being toxic is its actual intention. It's classic "divide and conquer", and conquering us is the ultimate aim of the totalitarians at the top of the power pyramid. 

The mistake many people make is to confuse the muppets with the, er, muppeteers. Magda Szubanski, and so many activist members of the LGBTQIA+ community (and what a bollocks term that is, just as the "heterosexual community" would be if people decided to invoke it) are sanctimonious and annoying. But in the end they are just useful idiots for their calculating cultural Marxist thought leaders

Non-hetero slebs like Magda have been brainwashed into thinking that they're oppressed by society. M'kay ... If she's so oppressed, and our society is so "homophobic" then how'd she become so successful, admired, and I suspect wealthy in the first place?

Being one of the anointed, she feels that only she and her fellow woke folk get to use right-on terms of condemnation. Below is her response to a torrent of abuse after she liked a mean-spirited tweet by Marcia Langton (who has form on this sort of thing BTW) basically claiming that a self-described gay conservative couldn't be both. He only thought he was gay, she tweeted, because "he masturbates too much".

Surely hateful by any measure. And we all know how Magda and her ilk would react if an influential rightie had tweeted mockingly about a powerless gay person's sexuality and an even more influential rightie had liked it.

What's amazing is how she not only denies that the tweet itself was homophobic, but she then goes on to cast herself as the victim. I don't doubt that much of the reaction she got was nasty and abusive (which should always be condemned of course) but a lot of it was completely justified criticism of her obvious hypocrisy. Still, in classic SJW style she didn't show any humility or maturity. She just doubled down instead.

You really couldn't get a clearer example of the rules of political correctness. Magda clearly implies that the term homophobia (hatred and fear of homosexuals) is only to be used to describe righties, especially Christians. So it's a term to sledge political opponents, not protect sexual minorities. Which makes it just another one of PC Left's deceitful labels along with Islamophobia, climate change denialism, misogyny and toxic masculinity.

The line is that PC leftie gays and lesbians, etc, just can't ever be guilty of homophobia, even when they are. But if the same standard cannot be applied across the board, then how can equality ever be achieved? And isn't that what PC LGBTIQ+ activists say they want?

Well, clearly not. They just want the power that comes from constantly claiming they are ... powerless. And they just can't see the irony. That's because they've been so completely indoctrinated by cynical control freaks into demanding special rights, and thereby sowing social discord. It suits the anti-Western, pro-globalist, cultural Marxist leaders to have such prominent "victims", even when, like Szubanski herself, they are nothing of the sort. On the contrary, they have clearly long had the world at their feet. Sad! 

But it's not just leftie atheists who pile on with the very selective condemnation of political opponents. Many woke Christians do too. Take their ABC's Julia Baird for example.

By focusing on the hate that people have expressed (rather than the valid criticism of hypocrisy) she manages to sidestep the issue, and merely repeat the same tactic of applying standards only when it suits the PC Left's divisive, misery-causing agenda. If Ms Baird sincerely believes her own talk, then why doesn't she condemn Langton for the obvious hateful abuse that provoked the mean tweets sledging Magda? 

I suspect she would say that's because Ms Langton is not a Christian (AFAIK). (She's prolly also wary of being labeled racist, since the same double standard applies regarding that issue as well.) But would she refuse to condemn right-leaning atheists for the same thing? Of course not.

See, Ms Baird is still doing what the sanctimonious hectoring woke folk always do: ignoring the ugly hate on her own side. That makes her just as much of a fool and a muppet as Magda herself.

And she must know how such brazen hypocrisy enrages people -- particularly when they also have to pay for it (by funding the ABC). Which I suspect is a big part of why she does it. That also makes her a bit of a troll, which she explicitly condemned in that very tweet. Not very "Christian" of you, Jules!

Unlike Israel Folau himself, who's remained restrained, dignified and forgiving throughout (even if, IMHO, he was wrongheaded). His original post was inclusive because absolutely everyone was on the "hell list". It was also loving, because he wanted all those "sinners" to be saved.

He repeated Ms Baird's exhortation. And coming from such a goodhearted place, he thereby improved upon it greatly.

How ironic is that? After all, it was Folau's so-called "hate" that started this big ugly ball of of right-on virtue-signalling and putrid leftie abuse rolling in the first place ... 

Saturday, June 29, 2019

Atheist lefties could easily ignore Israel Folau, so why don't they?

Pretty obvious that there is a massive long term push to erode the power and influence of Christianity throughout the West. It's particularly intense in the USA. And it's definitely getting that way here in Oz, with a howling pack of atheist lefties (along with a few religious woke folk) going hell for leather at Israel Folau.

As we all know, the PC Left consistently use sneaky tactics to achieve their goals. One of their faves is to choose a seemingly oppressed minority and falsely claim that the group they wanna slime are being big bad meanies to them. This is the primary ploy they use to attack Folau.

If you don't do your own thinking -- and sadly that is the case with a lot of people these days because of the dumbing down of education resulting from the PC Left's corruption of it -- then it might appear the accusation levelled at the rugby player is accurate. The Instagram post that set the whole firestorm off does say that homosexuals are going to hell, after all ... 

But while the list was short, it was extremely comprehensive. According to devout Christians atheists and idolators alone make up the vast majority of the world's population. Hardly discriminatory, it was actually highly, er, inclusive.

So this idea that Israel was singling out or targeting gays is absolute bollocks. So too was the idea that he was being hateful. (If you hate people you wouldn't wanna save them, right?) But of course the usual suspects were repeating this line ad nauseam.

Notice how Phelps fudges the issue by calling the stoush a "contractual dispute", zif it had nothing to do with Folau's religious beliefs. Gawd ... There are many Muslim sports stars who have a harsher view of the gay lifestyle than the Christian rugby player yet they haven't come a cropper in this way. Anthony Mundine is an obvious example.

Pirate Pete was true to form as he joined the pile on to kick another worshipper of "Big Sky Daddy". But it was interesting that such a high profile atheist didn't cast himself as a victim of Folau's post. And that was because he so obviously wasn't. How could you be upset about someone saying you'll be going to a place you don't even believe exists? Also, it would've looked completely ridiculous if such a thick skinned ol' lummox (and a former rugby player himself) claimed his pwecious wittle fee-fees were hurt.

So, rather than tackle Folau honestly, like he would've done on the field, and say he was driven by disdain for his religion specifically, he had to make it look like he was being all compassionate and caring. FFS, what a fake! 

So, he was implying that Folau's post could've contributed to suicide. That is such an absurd claim. Has there ever been a confirmed case in which some tormented whippersnapper offed himself because of something a sports star he admired said ... and about religion?

Even if there is a case to be made that the online brain farts of famous rugby players and the like exacerbate closeted kids' torment, the sensible response is to advise them to ignore such posts. (That adage about sticks and stones versus words comes to mind here.) Surely it would be best to say something along the lines of: "He's a rugby player, not a life coach. Respect his skills on the field, sure. But don't worry about the other things he says. He's talking utter BS!"

This is such an obvious solution to this so-called massive problem that even Father Flog himself endorsed it.

You know you're using a truly stupid argument when this shameless virtue signaller debunks it. Talk about a sign from, er, Rod!

And not only is Pirate Pete's argument idiotic, it's also likely to cause more harm than what it condemns. Rather than encouraging the confused, impressionable yoof to stop sweating the small (and silly) stuff and taking charge of their own emotions, it actually implies that they should cede control of them to their idols. To use a fave leftie term it's extremely disempowering.

To be honest, I think this might even be the intention of many of those who use it -- though that's unlikely in Fitzsimons' case because I doubt he's that diabolical. It suits the agenda of the most zealous and influential rainbow fascists that young gay kids are miserable even to the point of suicide because they can use this sad state of affairs to slime their number one target: Christianity and those who practise it. And that's not just wrongheaded but deeply sinister.

More thoughts on the Folau saga, and why he's received so much support from the normies below.

Thursday, June 20, 2019

Why Hollywood is full of deviled hams

Back in the day I used to do standup and character comedy. So I would hang out with comics, actors, musos and other arty wankers. There was a lot of high-minded talk about freedom of expression, creativity and all the rest of it. But it slowly dawned on me that rather than being individualist free thinkers this crowd were generally very conformist in their political views. 

By the late nineties I'd concluded that most of the people I knew -- while being very personable individuals -- were brainwashed by political correctness and deep green mania. I used to think of the most fervent greenies as religious in their zeal and jokingly referred to them as "ferndamentalists".

Occasionally I took the piss out of them in gigs, though there was a trick to doing that. You couldn't just go "balls out". The best approach was to sandwich your subversive "right-wing" gags in between more traditional fare mocking popular culture (eg TV shows) and pollies generally. If you showed complete and consistent disdain for the Left the audience may have gone with it, but the denizens of the comedy scene sure as hell wouldn't have. You'd be marking yourself as an ideological enemy and the gigs would slowly dry up for sure.

Needless to say having to self-censor was very depressing. It was the main reason I pretty much gave up comedy, only performing very occasionally. Haven't done a gig for many years now. 

Like all sane adults stuck in a leftist dominated milieux I found the ideological conformity deeply frustrating and the strange fervour these folk had for their causes -- feminist and green ones especially -- weird and a bit unsettling. They were daft, but dark; right on the cusp between silly and sinister -- sillister, for short!

At the time I had a couple of lines on this particular subject that I wanted to try out but don't think I ever did. That's because they weren't actual jokes with strong, sure-fire punchlines, obviously a crucial ingredient in any comedy routine.

The first was to describe these sillister folk as being trapped "in the belly of the Beast -- but they think it's an indoor swimming pool." The other was about how ironic it was that they hated Christians so much. After all, their whole world view seemed to be ripped off from the Bible. "It's just like the Garden of Eden except this time the serpent is the good guy!"

The reason I cite these two observations now is that at the time I didn't actually believe they dinkum worshipped the devil (and I still don't). I just thought they were so extreme in their views that they'd done a sort of spiritual about face and Luciferian imagery was the best thing I could think of to convey the concept. 

But now, twenty years on, I realize that I was actually onto something ...

The PC Left, particularly in America, have long been virulently anti-Christian because so much of what they see as bad, wrong and oppressive (like the traditional family, gender roles, etc) is promoted by the Church. If they can destroy its power, they are that much closer to implementing their creepy totalitarian agenda.

While most of these folk are just garden variety atheists, some of them are genuine Satan worshippers. They don't advertise that fact, of course. Occult power thrives in the dark, after all. Exposure is its kryptonite ... Hell, if you thought the Lord worked in mysterious ways, you should get a load of his nemesis! The Prince of Darkness is the "father of lies" and is always dissembling.

While these deluded control freaks are found throughout the upper echelons of politics, business and other fields they are extremely powerful in Hollywood.

And their influence is obvious. So much of what the joint produces is not just atheistic, but deeply anti-Christian. Can you even think of major studio flick since, say, Ben Hur that had a clear pro-Christian theme? The only one that comes to my mind in recent years is The Passion of the Christ. And think of how controversial that was ...

As well as the anti-Christian subtext of so much popular culture in the West -- which as we all know is completely dominated by Hollywood -- there's been an overt obsession with sprucing up Old Nick's image of late.

The above doco is just one example. Think of all the dark movies and series that have come out lately in which "evil" characters are the actual protagonists; the ones the audience are meant to identify with and not the bad guys who must be defeated.

There's also heaps of occult imagery in the MSM these days: goats, pentagrams, and the like. And it's everywhere, even in Oz.

Take the new online publication tweeted above. I first saw it advertised slickly (and expensively) in a video in a city train station. I thought the goat symbol was very odd, especially for Australia. Wouldn't quolls, numbats or bilbies be the go? And how did it get the obvious loads of money behind it? If you check it out you'll see it's chockas with sleb-centric fake news. Call me a parochial puritan if you like, but I smell globalist sulfur ...

So what's going on here? Looks to me like a massive, international, long term, stealth campaign by the occult elite to instill their dark narratives in our consciousness.

The vast majority of cultural content producers aren't overt devil worshippers, of course. But they are slowly but surely being fed satanic symbolism from on high and rewarded for promoting it.

Watch the video below and tell me there isn't something seriously creepy and wrong going on -- and right under our noses!

Sunday, May 26, 2019

The climate changes but leftie elites never do

So there have been more of these bizarre climate change rallies by kids across the globe. These are creepy and wrong on so many levels.

The extent to which kids are being brainwashed with this doom-laden bollocks is sickening. And it's not just greenies terrifying their own children. The state is actively involved in this process via the education system. Not every teacher encourages their students to take part in these demos but many of them do. And they're all expected to repeat the massive lies peddled by Al Gore and his ilk.

It would be much more professional, responsible and ultimately far better for children's mental and emotional health if they were taught what all rational and sane folk have long known: that the climate is always changing, and has been for yonks.

Yes, we're probably having some influence on it but in ways that are hard to quantify. And it's just crazy to think that we can turn the planet's temperature up and down like a thermostat -- least of all by paying more for fricken electricity! 

FFS, even if warmists had a solid case their predictions should not be taught in schools. Kids should be protected from such horrifying scenarios. And the fact that it's all a yuge, global scam makes what's happening in education -- particularly in the primary and secondary levels -- even worse!

Recently I blogged about this push by warmists to turn schools into indoctrination camps. And here is some Limey activist proudly reconfirming this very point.

Oh the irony!

In a strange way this daft Brit is actually correct. This is what education looks like these days -- because it's been completely hijacked by Gaia-worshipping doomsayers. Needless to say it shouldn't be like this at all. Education should be about teaching kids how to think, not what to think.

And the fact that schoolteachers, of all people, now tell their students that the whole world is gonna fry unless they get out and wave placards about is just disgusting.

Traumatizing kids to push your own nasty political agenda is definitely child abuse. And influential activists and politicians like Adam Bandt are the most culpable. I hope they are held responsible and severely punished one day for what they have done. 

Just look at the smug little soy boy. He's pleased as punch he's got all his minions mind-controlled.

Does he believe the massive lies he's told them? Somehow, I doubt it.

If he dinkum reckons that "we're all gonna die!" because of global warming then he wouldn't be sporting such a calmly self-satisfied expression, now would he? To me, this looks much more like the face of a narcissist savouring the power he has over others.

And check out the frightbat holding the sign as she beams at the dreadlocked nature boy -- who himself appears to be grinning.

Maybe they're flirting with each other, who knows ... Whatever's actually going on it massively contradicts the sentiment expressed by her stupid sign.

Looks very much like they're just peddling this bollocks because all the other muppets around them are. But most of the kids who've been exposed to this rubbish genuinely believe what they've been told by their parents, guardians and teachers. Childhood is traumatic enough without the threat of impending global catastrophe to worry about!

I really feel sorry for them. It's very different to what I went through as a child during the Cold War. And that was a time when there was a genuine possibility that the world was gonna end ...

Thursday, May 9, 2019

Dinkum Bill is a fake narrative

Predictably many lefties have been shrieking up a storm about the Daily Telegraph correcting Bill Shorten regarding what he said about his mum on Q and A. But I was surprised when Bolta condemned the story. I think that's because he knows from personal experience how much hurt relatives of public figures can feel when their family history becomes the subject of public discussion.

I can understand that. But Bill Shorten is running for the most important job in the land and an election is only days away now. Perfectly reasonable for the media to have the blowtorch on full blast when applying it to his belly!

Also, strikes me as a bit naive that he didn't expect this treatment. He's been a public figure for many years -- not just as Opposition Leader but also as one of the top dogs in Australia's cut-throat union movement.

He called the story "gotcha shit". But was it?

I don't think so at all. The issue of character is extremely important in a PM. And while it's obvious that politics often requires a flexible relationship with the truth citizens do want to know how trustworthy and genuine a candidate is at his psychological core before casting their votes. Some pollies will dissemble or even lie only as a last resort, while others are just full-on dodgy blokes who tell massive porkies as easy as breathing.

Bill Clinton is the most extreme version I can think of in the latter category. I don't think our Bill is that far gone, but he's getting there ...

And in the way he talked about his mum the other night he was clearly being selective with the truth for political purposes. While he had publicly stated that she was a lawyer at other times, that's irrelevant. On this occasion, in front of an impressionable audience, he wove what was basically a sob story about how she missed out on her ambitions in that regard.

He then invoked that emotive narrative to cast himself as a kinda Gandhi figure who was gonna give the whole nation the opportunities that his mum was so unfairly denied. It wasn't just disingenuous but bizarre. He was talking down her achievements to big note himself!

This is clear from the transcript below and even more obvious when you watch the video.

It’s as... I’m going to finish on this point. I went to this university. The reason I went to this university is ‘cause my mum worked here for 33 years. My mum came from a working-class family. She was the first in our family in the early ‘50s to ever go to university, ever. No-one ever thought... My grandma, English grandma, she was a cleaner and a barmaid. They wouldn’t have thought we’d ever be sitting here, talking to you like this. But if my mum... And she became a teacher, but she wanted to be a lawyer, but she was the eldest in the family, so needed to take the teacher scholarship to look after the rest of the kids. My mum was a brilliant woman. She wasn’t bitter. She worked here for 35 years. But I also know that if she had had other opportunities, she could have done anything.

I can’t make it right for my mum. And she wouldn’t want me to. But my point is this – what motivates me, if you really want to know who Bill Shorten is, I can’t make it right for my mum but I can make it right for everyone else. This is a country... I don’t care who you vote for – I’d like you to vote for us – I don’t care what god you worship, I don’t care how long you’ve been here, your accent, your family, what job they do, but I reckon that if this country can just let people be as talented and as capable by giving them all the same opportunity, we won’t all be the same at the end of the day, but then nothing gonna hold this country back. When we’re equal, when we get equal opportunity, we are going to be the best country in the world, with no arrogance. That’s my leadership style.

There's no doubt about what he was communicating to the audience. Yet some of his MSM supporters were in denial. Take this "journo" here:

Okay, Shorten wasn't actively tryna cover it up. But he did make a glaring omission to make it seem that his mum never achieved her dreams so that he could cast himself as the bloke who, as PM, would help everyone else achieve theirs.

It was pretty damn bogus, no two ways about it! And the ease with which he promoted this fake narrative was a real worry. This aspect of his character is something a lot of people are waking up to, which is one of the main reasons the race has narrowed in recent weeks.

Yet this dude continued to talk Bill Shorten up, zif he's a magical uniter of old foes. But the fact that Gillard, Rudd and Keating sat together at the launch suggests something else entirely: They all know what he's really like, and they're absolutely packin' death that a big swathe of the electorate will realize this too and the election will be lost. The show of unity was a desperate attempt to stop this from happening. 

This cooperation between long time enemies Hawke and Keating is another example of just how worried they are.

Clearly, the party is desperately pushing the line that Bill is just a really lovely caring, sharing bloke who wants the best for everyone -- no fibs! And the muppets at their ABC are doing their part, pedaling this bollocks narrative with gusto. 

"Utter authenticity"? Gawd.

Does she really believe that? Seems she's being a tad disingenuous herself ... If not, well, that's just sad.

To me and I suspect a rapidly growing number of Aussies, Bill Shorten comes across as a kind of latter day Les Patterson -- though not nearly as priapic, disheveled and boozy, of course.

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Leftie ferals are making a truly crappy omelette

Leftist radicals of the sixties and seventies claimed that their main motivation was pacifism. But they were actually hell-bent on promoting communism.

Their conservative opponents often accused them of being OTT and violent. In response to this, one of their favourite phrases was: "If you wanna make an omelette, you've gotta crack a few eggs!"

Fast forward to 2019. The more things change, etc ... Only this time, the protestors are not being metaphorical.

There was that idiot who egged Fraser Anning, and now some stupid girl has gone and done the same thing to ScoMo. Maybe she's tryna make some feminist statement, and strike a blow for gender egg-quality or something. But all she's done is show how unhinged, incoherent and violent the Left have become.

At this stage it also seems likely that she's aligned to the animal rights movement. If that's the case then her gooey stunt was even more of a sad yolk.

Hell, if she wants better treatment for "non-human persons" including chickens then she's definitely gone about it the wrong way. Throwing an egg at someone in the name of animal rights is like a human rights advocate using a small child as a weapon to beat an opponent.

As well as this incident, there have been many other truly nasty acts committed by greenies and lefties. They even killed a dog apparently! And it's just been reported that a hollowed out book with a turd in it has been left at Tony Abbott's electoral office. It included a note that read "unpopular".

Gawd. And they're tryna make him look bad? Whatever Tony Abbott has done in his life, both politically and personally, there's no way he ever did anything as repugnant as leaving a poo in a box at the office of an enemy.

But of course the hateful lefties can't see the irony. They're pushing the narrative that Abbott is such a noxious character that he provokes this kind of reaction in otherwise reasonable people. But that will only work with primitive idiots like themselves. And they would be supporting Zali Steggall or other leftie candidates anyway.

This is truly desperate stuff. I suspect it will backfire on them big-time. But if it actually does the opposite and helps lower his vote on election day then this country is in a far more dire situation than I thought.

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Zali Steggall campaign: top-down directive makes volunteers camera shy

Earlier today I had an interesting experience that I think said something about the way Zali Steggall's campaign is being run. There's a lot of talk about her links to Getup and how she's a kind of cat's paw for globalist forces who peddle warmist bollocks. I had a brief interchange with one of her supporters that seemed to confirm this narrative.

There's a bit of context to it so please bear with me as I fill that in:

See, as well as this blog, I have another one which is not to do with politics or current affairs at all. Basically, it's just a way for me to share photos of interesting landmarks, buildings, and statues in and around Sydney. I have a YouTube channel for it as well.

Now, today I had planned to make a quick video of the Lady of Commerce statue out the front of the Royal Exchange building at 56 Pitt Street. Even did a bit of research so I could include some interesting facts in my narration.

On my way there I made this short video of the Department of Lands building:

Anyhoo, a coupla minutes after doing that I got to the corner of Pitt and Bridge Sts and was surprised to see a bunch of election campaign placards out the front of 56 Pitt St as well as volunteers from the various parties handing out how to vote pamphlets, etc. They occupied the pavement in front of the statue, which put the kibosh on my original plan to do a little video about the statue itself. 

Curious about why they were there weeks before election day I started talking to a Liberal Party volunteer. He told me that this was a polling place for early voting. I joked that I was one of the few conservatives in the inner west before taking one of his pamphlets and walking off.

I didn't want to waste a visit, though, and considered making a video for my more politically themed YouTube channel. During the state election recently I got this video just to give people a sense of the scene at the Newtown polling place. I was toying with the idea of doing another one like that, but decided to opt for a couple of shots instead.

I was keen to incorporate the Lady of Commerce statue because of the link between business and politics. Then I could add a smartarse caption like: "If Zali Steggall wins Warringah, let's hope she's as good for business as the grand old lady behind her. Something tells me she won't be!" (Haw, haw.)

And for this one: "ScoMo spotted at the 'top end of town'. Hmm. Maybe Bill was right after all?" (Thinking emoji.)

I was shuffling around for a few minutes tryna get these shots right. So I understand how it might have looked a little bit suss to the volunteers.

Anyhoo, while I was standing there looking at the photos I had taken one of the Steggall volunteers came up to me and strikes up a convo about the statue. Then he segues into the subject of the campaign itself and mentions that photos of the volunteers were not allowed.

I hadn't taken any photos specifically of the people there at all, and had no intention of doing so. I reassured him of that and said they might just end up as tiny figures in the background.

Then he told me that they'd had some trouble with Tony Abbott supporters and that the boss (whoever that was -- doubt it was Ms Steggall herself) had ordered that no photos of volunteers could be taken (or words to that effect). 

I'm not quite sure what that meant. And was that something that could even be enforced? I suspect things have been getting pretty full-on in Warringah of late and the team was worried about being identified and subsequently doxxed.

In any case it struck me as pretty OTT. And BTW this is not so much a criticism of the dude who told me. He was polite and didn't seem like some jumped up narcissist throwing his weight around. He genuinely seemed to be passing on a directive from someone above him.

I told him I wouldn't be doing anything like that. To which he replied, "Well you don't look like a Tony Abbott supporter ..." This was a reference to my scruffy appearance, no doubt. I'm not exactly a Hugo Boss model on the best of days but today I prolly resembled Grizzly Adams after a three day bender. I nodded and laughed as if to agree.

I could sense he was still a tad suspicious, so I reassured him again. I said: "Don't worry, I'm just here taking photos of statues and buildings for my blog ..."

Then he walked away suddenly saying: "That doesn't sound like ..." He cut himself off in mid-sentence as he strode off so I can't be exactly sure what he meant, but what I think happened was that he concluded that I was dissembling about my reasons for being there, and that I had actually lobbed as some sorta clandestine operative for the eeevil Lord Abbott!

Quite frankly this pissed me off.

Yes I'm a conservative, and I'd prefer ScoMo over Shorten for sure. I also hope Tony wins Warringah though I'll have no effect on that result at all because I'm not in his electorate.

But I really was just there by chance, with no political motivation at all. And I'm definitely not part of any psyop for the Abbott campaign.

If that dude hadn't come up to me to suss out why I was there and -- seemingly -- disbelieved my reasons I would have just made this a general post about the impending election, with the shots and captions included above.

But now it's specifically about Zali Steggall's campaign and how it's being run.

I mean, FFS, telling your volunteers that they can't be photographed at polling places (which implies the right to deny photographers their rights to take them) seems pretty OTT and authoritarian, dunnit?

I know that the stakes are very high this election -- particularly in Warringah -- so I can understand that volunteers for all parties might be more than a tad on edge. But what I thought was interesting was that it was the Steggall volunteer who approached me, not any of the others.

Hell, there was a Greens dude there and he didn't seem perturbed. And this is the kind of behaviour you'd think would be more likely to come from them than any other party, right? 

If what this guy said about being told by "the boss" that they "couldn't be photographed" was dinkum it sounds like a pretty authoritarian operation. This is at odds with Ms Steggall's repeated claims to be "independent" and seems to confirm that there's a big, bossy machine behind her calling the shots.

Now I know this is a pretty long post about something quite minor. Maybe I'm reading way too much into it. 

Also, several weeks ago I was physically attacked in the street by a fricken lunatic who thought I was taking shots of him, and not the charming old cafe he was sitting in, so I do have a bit of an issue when people start telling me -- however subtly -- what I can and can't photograph in a public place. Maybe I haven't yet achieved closure over that and it's clouding my thinking, I dunno ...

Still, the episode struck me as very odd and somewhat significant given the context. Hence the post.

What do you reckon? 

Saturday, April 27, 2019

Falun Dafa (Falun Gong) demonstration at Customs House

I was in the library at Customs House last Wednesday, and upon leaving the building late in the afternoon I was surprised to see a demonstration occurring outside. There were scores of people there to raise awareness of Falun Dafa (better known as Falun Gong).

This a multi-faceted spiritual practice that involves quigong. Its philosophy is focused on the need for truthfulness, compassion and forbearance. Sadly, the Chinese Government perceives this popular and benign movement to be a serious threat.

So, scores of local Falun Gong practitioners were holding a group meditation session. It was meant to give a sense of the movement's peaceful nature.

As protests go, it was so much more restrained and dignified than any of the shouty, lefty demos I've witnessed. Proves that you can make your point very effectively if you do it calmly.

The date of the event was significant. It marked the 20th anniversary of a peaceful appeal for fair treatment in Beijing. Since then things have only gotten worse. The government has been viciously oppressing the group, with many members imprisoned and killed. There have been horror stories of them performing organ harvesting on live victims as well.

But events like this do raise international awareness about the issue which in turn builds pressure on China. Hopefully in time that nation will halt its appalling treatment of these peaceful people.

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

"Easter worshippers" is another creepy PC term

Many people noticed the bizarre response to the horrific Sri Lanka attacks from many high profile Democrats and their supporters. Instead of describing the victims accurately as Christians, they called them "Easter worshippers".

You often see politically correct terms like this being used these days. They are clearly part of a wider leftist effort to diminish the power and influence of Christianity. (There's a great book on this subject by David Horowitz, BTW. He's a former leftist radical so he knows all about just how mean and crazy these scumbag zealots actually are. It's called Dark Agenda.)

As with so much behaviour from the PC Left it was sinister in several ways. There was the robotic replication of the phrase in nearly simultaneous tweets, for example. It's as if they had all actually received a memo telling them to use that particular phrase. And that was almost certainly the case.

If you've been following the whole Q phenomenon you'll know how the Deep State sends out preferred talking points to politicians and fake news outlets like CNN before dawn. That's why you see so many similar MSM stories appearing at the same time, sometimes with near identical headlines. (One of the popular recent targets has been the Q "conspiracy theory" itself, with scores of hit pieces claiming it had been debunked when the opposite is clearly the case.)

This spate of "Easter worshippers" tweets from several Democrats including Obama and Hillary was another example of that, or something very similar.

Now, a lot of people think that big name "liberals" will use a term like this because they can't bring themselves to say "Christian" and that it's an unconscious omission, kinda like a Freudian slip. Well, I'm sure they find saying or writing it unpleasant. But I suspect they are fully aware of what they are doing when they choose to use a replacement term like this. And they know how offensive it is to Christians themselves. That's exactly why they do it, IMO.

I suspect this is also why Hillary said in the tweet that she was "praying" for the victims. She has long purported to worship God. But if rumours are true this is a facade not unlike her marriage to Bill. It seems she "bats for the other side" in more ways than one ...

These are deeply mean-spirited people. They are into gaslighting. They do this because they find it pleasurable. It can also be highly demoralizing to their opponents.

I don't think it's nearly as effective in this regard as it used to be, however. That's because gaslighting as a form of soul destruction only works if you have total control of the narrative that your target audience believes.

Then you can rename -- or flat out omit to mention -- a particular faith or specific belief and leave its followers confused as to why that would be the case. Without an alternative explanation, these people would think maybe they were the ones who were going mad.

But that is definitely not the case these days. The MSM has lost much of its credibility in the eyes of most Americans and even many Aussies. Other, more reliable sources of news are now online and being shared like crazy on social media. The truth will set you free, as the biblical saying goes. It also fills you with confidence borne of conviction.

So, cruel little touches like saying "Easter worshippers" no longer have the same power to unsettle, confuse and thereby erode the faith of believers. They actually do the opposite.

We are all onto these disgusting people and their sick mind games. Their psychological power over all of us -- atheists such as myself included -- is waning inexorably.

The murderous hatred that motivated the Sri Lanka attacks continues, sadly. But the fact that the globalist PC Left gets less mileage out of them is certainly a heartening development. 

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Lefties prefer an ignorant electorate

Lefties are forever quacking on about how they want freedom for humanity. But that, like most of what they say, is total bollocks. They want everything centralized so that they can control it. And they want the whole population to subscribe to the same narratives that they dictate. Socialism is clearly an authoritarian, top down system.

Being such control freaks, they are deeply unsettled when the plebs think for themselves and start questioning the "official narrative" that they've been given. Look at what's happening in the USA, with the mainstream media and their humongous two year long porky about Trump and collusion with Russia.

Millions of people across America and the globe are realizing that the MSM are just pumping out titanic lies all the time. They're sharing dissenting views on social media, so the lefties who own these platforms are desperately trying to stifle that process by flat out punting prominent nationalists, conservatives and the like -- or at least inhibiting their reach.

Of course there's heaps of other evidence that the Left prefers dummies and dupes to thinking voters. And here's a local example. It's just a tweet, but I thought it was quite revealing.

Below is the tweep's profile. Clearly your typical "feelings over facts" lefty.

I really don't think she's being tongue in cheek with that tweet. Shorten (whom she calls "Bill") has had a horror week, being unable to answer questions about how a Labor government would fund its promises, among other things.

Rather than expressing the wish that the Labor leader would get his arse into gear and have some facts at the ready for the next press pack attack, she basically says she hopes that ill-informed and disengaged voters will be calmed by his "honest eyes" and still vote for him!

Now, saying that Shorten's utterly empty eyes look honest is bad enough. But hoping that they'll convince ignorant, apathetic people to vote for him is just plain desperate. 

Yet this kind of thinking is par for the course with the Left. They try to appeal to the lowest common denominator and get over the line that way. And whenever they are in power they try to dumb the electorate down even more! No wonder they are all for compulsory voting. Means a good whack of those participating aren't interested in the issues and are only doing it because they have to. 

It's also why the Greens in particular keep pushing for the voting age to be lowered. We all know that the younger you are, the less you know about the world and the way it works. Whippersnappers are much easier to con with crazy talk about climate catastrophe and all the rest. And the Greens are absolutely shameless in doing just that!

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

The Project should win an award for PC propaganda

Pretty obvious that the entire MSM here is captured by cultural Marxists. They relentlessly push the PC line on all issues, while purporting to be fair and balanced.

It's depressing to see it in the ABC -- even more so in the commercial media. You would hope that market forces would prevail. But they don't. That's because all the big media companies lean left. Perhaps the most reality-based is News Ltd. But even that's chockas with right-on muppets. It just has a few righties to even things up a bit.

Whole landscape is like big tech. It's a collective monopoly type situation. TV is prolly the worst in this regard. The big free to air channels Nine, Ten and Seven have such power, influence and reach built up over many decades that they can afford to inflict this toxic cant on us and it won't hit their bottom line hard enough to mean they have to accept other narratives.

So, sadly, political correctness runs right through the MSM. And surely one of the most seriously infected programs is The Project. It's gotta be the dumbest, ugliest show on the teev for sure!

Even the name creeps me out: "The Project." Makes it sound like a sinister deep state psyop or something; an experiment in brainwashing the yoof by utilizing vapid twats peddling PC talking points.

The sleb-soaked sneerfest proclaims itself to be "news delivered differently". Sod off! Fake news delivered smugly, more like. Whole vibe of the show is creepy and wrong.

FFS, fakery fills every fricken pixel! Even their "spontaneous" mischief reeks of self-consciousness and insincerity. It's meant to seem down to earth and self-effacing. But any sane person can tell they're elitist poseurs peddling a malignant agenda.

Correction: self-love.

You look at these vapid twats and think why the hell are they so pleased with themselves? They're not there because of skill or merit. Their fame -- and therefore their implied authority -- is entirely conditional. They have to keep peddling the narrative that's given to them, or be punted if they don't.

Like when it comes to issues like domestic violence ...

Hamish MacDonald earnestly trots out the "all men are to blame" bollocks. And he calls himself a journalist?

No way. Like so many of them now he's just an activist. If he were interested in the truth he'd say: "Wait on, that's a crock. If some arsehole beats his wife all men aren't to blame. He is!"

He'd start asking questions of those pushing such an obvious lie. Instead, he obediently repeats it himself.

And it's echoed by zombie viewers on the next level down.

Latest campaign the show's sinister sleb-bots are pushing is that the Barry Award should be changed to something that doesn't have "transphobic" connotations.

The whole transgender thing is part of something much bigger. It's like the "Islamophobia" lie that demonizes anyone who makes pointed criticisms of Islam. Sliming people as "transphobic" for simply pointing out the bleedin' obvious is clearly designed to intimidate and confuse the normies and thereby weaken society's foundations even more than they are already.

And renaming an award that echoes the legacy of an Australian cultural icon is akin to knocking down a statue of Captain Cook -- though on a much smaller, milder scale of course. 

Look at this chubby muppet quacking on about love, safety and inclusiveness. Oh, FFS!

And he's supposed to be the show's resident comedian? He obviously didn't get the memo. He's supposed to tell jokes -- not be one.

Whoopsy! My bad ... He did get a memo, and that's what he's reading out above. If he has any of his own thoughts, which I doubt, he knows better than to express them. In PC TV Land wrongthink is verboten -- The Narrative Is All!

As we all know, the PC Left are lying all the time. It's all they can do. Their whole worldview is a massive, reeking pile o' porkies, after all. And they have to relentlessly inflict these falsehoods on the rest of us to try and make them come true.

So if they say that this "doesn't have to be seen as a slap to Barry Humphries" that is exactly what it is.

And it's quite obvious why this is the case. Humphries has long been a prime target for cultural Marxists. He is a tall poppy, and one of the few conservatives with cultural power in Oz, after all. So for them this is a twofer, really.

And The Project is their tool box -- sorry, box of tools -- for conning the masses.

But more and more people are waking up now. You've really gotta wonder how long they can keep this creepy clown show going. The whole con has to fall apart eventually, surely ...

Monday, April 15, 2019

I spy with my little eye ... lots of other eyes!

I mentioned in a previous post that I'd been seeing heaps of occult symbolism, specifically eye symbols everywhere. So I've included some below.

But just to clarify: I'm not claiming that all those who produce these images are in on the global conspiracy and are consciously creating them to brainwash the masses for their eeevil overlords. What I believe is that these symbols have been seeded into the culture from on high over many years.

If you start to look into this whole subject with an open mind you'll realize that the New World Order really is a thing and secret societies are a big part of it. Without a doubt many powerful people at the "top of the pyramid" have long been using popular culture as a way to "preemptively program" the masses.

It's like with the fashion industry. Normies are led to believe that fashions in clothing, hairstyles etc rise organically, bottom up, from the people themselves. But it's actually the other way around. Taste makers plan everything in advance and decide what the fashions for the year will be. Then they roll them out as if as if it was some sort of democratic, popularity-based process.

Another analogy: Even though there's been a sustained, massive campaign on many fronts to erase Christianity in Australia and other countries, its symbolism is still pervasive and powerful. We all know what a cross represents. And even if you're not religious you more than likely use the phrase "Oh my God!" to express shock.

That's because of the residual power of the church having seeded the culture with its imagery in the West over centuries.

That's what's going on here, though kinda in reverse. The Illuminati don't openly control society like the Church did. They just pull strings from the shadows. And they're making sure that we're all primed for when they do get to, er, come out of their dark mansions, so to speak.

With this in mind here are some examples of eye imagery that I didn't even look for. I just went through photos I'd been taking and selected some that included it.

Got this CCTV sign in Petersham subway. Just a reminder that "Big Brother" is watching. (Interesting that it's the title of a reality TV show that's been running for many years.)

Saw this in Broadway Shopping Centre. Government funded festival.

This is part of what covers the scaffolding around a construction site in the city. I think it's a print of Reg Mombassa's work.

This is from another construction site. It was chockas with occult imagery. I'll write a whole post about it when I have time.

Street art in Newtown.  

Street art in Petersham.

Street art in Newtown.

Interesting that it shows a pop star, Keshia. The music industry is absolutely chockas with this kind of stuff.

Every A-list rock star has flashed the Illuminati eye on occasion. It seems to be a prerequisite for stardom. Hell, even living legends like Paul McCartney are known to, er, "genuflect" in this way

The rabbit hole is deep, people. And the all-seeing eye is everywhere ...

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Signs of the globalist elites' agenda are everywhere

It's been amazing to watch the American mainstream media shamelessly, relentlessly push the "Russian collusion" hoax for two years in an effort to destroy POTUS. Now that they have been totally exposed by Robert Mueller's official conclusion that there was "nothin' to see here, folks" their credibility is in tatters.

When you realize how brazenly these scumbags lied about this, you wonder about all the other stuff they're "reporting" on. Surely many of the narratives that these yugely powerful corporations have been pushing for decades are dodgy as all get out, if not entirely false.

Having come to this realization, I'm becoming more and more convinced that conspiracy theories about the New World Order and specifically the Illuminati actually have a lot of truth to them. It feels weird to have come to that conclusion because even a year ago I would have said these ideas were total bollocks and anyone who believed them needed to take his tin-foil hat off!

But since I've become a newbie "truther" I've been seeing signs and symbols that seem to reflect this agenda all over the place.

Take the eye symbol. This is of course synonymous with the Illuminati.

You should, er, keep an eye out for it. You'll see it in heaps of public art -- also in advertising. Take this display for a recent show.  

On the other side is an ad for another one, Body Worlds, which also has a creepy NWO vibe to it. Remember that the control freaks at the top of the pyramid have the ultimate goal of enslaving humanity in a fascist globalist state.

To achieve that, they have to indoctrinate everyone with the belief that human beings are nothin' special -- that the soul doesn't really exist. This is why they hate Christianity with a passion and they're such zealous advocates of abortion, among other things.

Displaying actual flayed human corpses to the public -- kids included -- seems to be part of this process. Sure, they say it's about demystifying humanity. But it's also dehumanizing, surely.

Now I'm not saying that all those involved in these shows are secret society members, or even aware of this agenda. But it's interesting that such projects get funded, right? They must be massively expensive to produce. Only heavy hitters could get them up and running.

It's like with Hollywood productions. The A-list producers and agents decide which movie projects get the big money. It's well established that Tinseltown is chockas with Illuminati freaks. And no wonder. It's the "dream factory" -- the place where narratives are created, and for the entire world.

Similar process here, I reckon. 

Monday, April 8, 2019

To PC lefties everything's political ... and nothing is

We all know that PC lefties lie all the time. They just can't help themselves. Also, if they didn't do this, they would never have achieved the power and influence they have so far. 

The ultimate goal for these sad, desperate creeps is control of others -- the more the better. And while they all share this affliction greenies are the worst. Pretty clear that they are "watermelons" -- green on the outside and red underneath!

While radical cultural Marxists do sometimes resort to violence (eg Antifa) they prefer not to. Why use biffo when you can achieve the same ends through stealth? It's worked a treat for them so far. They've been subverting institutions for ages, and now control many of them outright.

Just look at the universities. Free speech, and therefore free thought, is verboten at most of them now. And they have pretty much become petri-dishes for mental illnesses that can be weaponized for even more audacious power grabs down the track.

Not only are PC lefties always lying about their true intentions, they're doing it on many fronts simultaneously. They politicize absolutely everything! It's a tactic well summarized by the feminist phrase "the personal is political".

Among other things, this is to keep us all in a state of confusion and insecurity. If the masses are distracted, radical changes can be implemented bit by bit without them noticing.

In their relentless effort to deceive, and ultimately control, the population, cultural Marxists will go to the opposite extreme as well. They'll claim that what they're doing is not political at all.

This tweet is a perfect example. The ASRC is claiming, and with a straight face, that "getting loud online" and thereby "creating a choir for change" is actually a way of moving beyond politics!

Yeah, suuure!

Ultimately the ASRC is a highly political organization. Underneath all its fine talk, it's clearly supportive of the erosion of sovereignty. That's because sovereignty is one of the main foundations of nationalism, which international socialism is desperately trying to erase. But the ASRC masks this goal with a whole lot of touchy-feely, huggy-wuggy bollocks about compassion, tolerance, and all the rest of it.

And here's another example of deceitful language: "radical empathy".

The verbose tweet above is a convoluted way of saying: "You should all get political with us! We can all get shouty and demonize the wider culture by claiming it's riven with racism, sexism, homophobia, etc."

Doing this is just sooo important to these right-on influencers and their ilk. That's because once they've got the main societal foundations crumbling, they're much easier to destroy completely. And once that's done, a global top down socialist regime can replace it. In fact it has to replace it because the only other alternative is chaos. 

That is always the end game for the PC crowd. But they can't actually come out and say that because the whole idea is so repugnant to sane adults. So they use terms like "radical empathy" which makes it sound like they're noble and selfless.

It's a term that someone like Sarah Hanson Young would happily use -- if she doesn't already. But remember what she said when over a thousand asylum seekers drowned as a direct result of policies she supported: "Accidents happen."

No empathy at all ...

Don't believe anything these people say even for a minute. Keep watching them with a critical eye and sooner or later it'll become clear what they're really after.

Saturday, April 6, 2019

Political correctness is a thought blocker

Pretty obvious that socialists love to control people. Not only do they get off on it, their whole ideology requires it. It's a top down system, after all.

They've got this crazy idea that they can create a utopia by bossing people around. If you've got your thinking cap on, you'll immediately realize that this is just not gonna work. You'll also look at leftism's gruesome history of failure. The further left you go, the higher the body count.

Why anyone would subscribe to any kind of Marxism -- particularly the cultural kind -- is incomprehensible to any sane, rational, thoughtful person.

And that's the key to its, er, appeal -- for want of a better word. You'd only subscribe to it if you're not actually thinking.

Which is how this "mind virus" infects, and ultimately converts people. It installs a set of rigid dogmas to do with race, gender, sexuality, the environment and other things in the brain, associating powerful negative emotions with any deviation from them. This is political correctness, and it's a self-replicating system.

Once a person's mind has been captured, individual thought about these subjects is pretty much impossible. This is why PC lefties are so spectacularly hypocritical. It's not just that they are self-centred and therefore unwilling to hold themselves up to the standards they demand of others (and we can all be guilty of that, let's face it!). It's also because they aren't thinking.  They are just obeying.

Take ABC airhead Juanita Phillips.

Seeing that her fellow traveller Zali Steggall was copping a shellacking on Twitter, she tweeted a dopey defence. Clearly the criticism was of Ms Steggall's hypocrisy, not simply her choice of vehicle. Sane adults such as Christine Forster were pointing out the so-called independent's refusal to walk -- or rather, drive -- her talk on environmental issues.

But Juanita just completely ignored the wider context. Her PC programming left her incapable of doing this, and so she went straight to the "woman as victim" defence -- another major component of cultural Marxism.

Here's another example. Recently Tim Soutphommasane tweeted on the subject of Ita Buttrose becoming ABC Chair. He sternly reminded her of the need to follow the ABC Charter when it came to ethnic diversity. 

I took a screenshot of that, and made a criticism of Tim and his selective interpretation of this document. He got wind of it, and clearly didn't understand the point I was making ... because he wasn't thinking.

Ironically he thought that's what my problem was!

He just couldn't see that I was making a point about the narrow focus of PC types like Tim himself. They see "diversity" only in terms of identity, not ideas. And the ABC Charter requires balanced reporting (ie diversity of views).

Would Tim want more righties in our -- sorry, his -- ABC? No way. That was my point.

He basically cherry picked an aspect of the charter to castigate Ita, but ignored the wider context. This is what PC does to you: It renders you incapable of thinking for yourself. All you can do is follow orders, and give them.


Saturday, March 30, 2019

Emmo marches to a different drum

We all know that employees and fervent supporters of their ABC are possessed by the collective delusion that only they can see the true workings of the world and it is their noble duty to enlighten all the poor, credulous rubes who have been duped by the likes of the eeevil Lord Rupert and his minions. You can see this silly subtext in most of its shows, but nowhere is it clearer than in its flagship lunar wankfest The Drum.

Every episode is a sanctimonious right-on circle jerk featuring some of the most daft and deluded cockwombles in the entire southern hemisphere. They routinely sit there bloviating in a manner that is way beyond self-satire. It's fricken hilarious and sooo predictable.

Best of all, the panelists' brainfarts are captured in tweet form. A high proportion of these summaries are nuggets of pure comedy gold, and even when they're not they give crystal clear insights into the parallel mental universe inhabited by the show's child-brained “experts”.

Take this offering from Dr Craig Emerson.

Any sane, rational adult can tell that Trump is bang on the money regarding this issue. There is an entire system structured to deliver fake news and get rid of him. It's called the mainstream media, which is pretty much the PR arm of the Democrat Party (and, until recently, a big chunk of the Republican Party as well).

These corrupt, lying scumbags are compromised and controlled by the deep state, who have been using them as puppets for decades and getting away with it. Trump poses an existential threat to this putrid coalition of Swamp rats, which is why they've been telling the most insane and ridiculous lies about him the whole time, totally trashing the MSM's credibility in the process.

Most people figured that out pretty early on. But now, after two years of the "Collusion Delusion", it's bleedin' obvious to all but the most rusted on Democrat bitter ender.

Then there's the false narrative surrounding “QAnon”. We haven't heard much about it here yet. But in the USA the fake news machine is desperately trying to portray the phenomenon as a deranged conspiracy theory. It's anything but.

Just the fact that not one so-called journalist from the MSM has asked POTUS whether Q is dinkum shows they're not at all interested in the truth. They are all clearly determined to push lies about Trump and those who support him in a relentless effort to bring him down.

Yet poor Emmo can't see these obvious patterns of behaviour, let alone join the dots.

He applies his child-brained interpretation to local issues too. With a straight face he implies that Pauline Hanson has her tin-foil hat on when she says that people in the mainstream media and political establishment are conspiring against her.

“There will be people who agree” he says, aghast. Um, yeah, that's because it's obviously true!

FFS, what a muppet.

Friday, March 22, 2019

Father Rod Bower is having a "Funeral for Coal"

Oh. My. Gawd. Father Flog is having a "funeral for coal"!

Will the poor deceased lump be cremated, I wonder? That would be a faux pas, eh? Saying "ashes to ashes" would be too ...

Sadly for Rod Bower coal won't cark it. But his silly stunt will surely kill satire stone dead. Black comedy or what!

Apart from the general idiocy of this clerical clown show, why is it coal that deserves the funeral? You only conduct a mourning ceremony over someone or something that you cared about, right?

Didn't think this through, did ol' God's Rod. But then, PC lefties never do. It's all about the feels, and in Father Bower's case, mining as much publicity as possible from the child-brained lefties who dominate our MSM. So asinine, and stuck in their emotive ways are these fossil fools ...

Also, as some have pointed out on Twitter, performing this faux ceremony cheapens the whole idea of a funeral, dunnit? And remember, as a priest Father Rod is qualified to officiate at them. 

In future what will families who had him administer the last rites to their loved ones think when they learn that he did the same for a fricken lump of coal?

Not a good look from a man with The Good Book ... 

But given he is so determined to trivialize the rites and rituals of his own Anglican faith, I reckon a baptism would've been the go -- though obviously not a "baptism of fire".

He could blissfully announce, say, the virgin birth of solar power, then give it his most holy blessing. Would be far more optimistic and positive than what he's gonna do now.

Better still, no props required! Dude reckons the sun shines out of his arse, after all.