Remember that ruckus that Sex and the City star Cynthia Nixon caused recently by saying that she chose to be gay? Yeah, well she's amended her position on the matter to fit in with a more stringent and PC line:
The star has now clarified her declaration, revealing that she is in fact "bisexual", which she does believe is "not a choice, it is a fact."
"What I have 'chosen' is to be in a gay relationship," the star continued.
Will be interesting to see if that is enough of a shift to satisfy the Official Enforcers of Correct Thought on Matters of Sexuality. Nixon is still talking about choice, which they obviously find deeply threatening.
Kind of ironic when you think about. Wasn't being gay, lesbian or whatever supposed to be all about enjoying freedom from strict and oppressive relationship structures?
And it's pretty clear that if you want to be accepted by the "gay community" (whatever the hell that is) and you believe sexuality is a choice, then you have very little choice about whether you can express that very belief publicly!
It's also ironic that Margaret Court is seen as a vile, dangerous bigot, when her belief is that sexuality is a choice.
Often intemperate and sometimes foam-flecked rants about politics, current events and popular culture by Perth blogger and very occasional standup Matt Hayden (obviously not the cricketer). Your problem if you can't spot the sit-down comedy.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Friday, January 27, 2012
The Tent Embassy fiasco and Gingerella's missing shoe
Whether you vote Labor or Liberal, you'd have to find seeing the nation's Prime Minister and Opposition Leader running in fear from an enraged mob of Aboriginal activists on Australia Day truly depressing. The fiasco showed just how ridiculous things have become in this country
when it comes to racial politics -- not to mention politics generally.
Then there was the role of the media ... Basically Abbott made some quite reasonable remarks about the Tent Embassy. Shameless lefty hacks beat them up. It also looks like there might have been some very slimy tactics from within the PM's office itself:
Sydney radio presenter Ray Hadley today said he'd received information that Ms Shaw or another protester had received a call from a Gillard staffer about comments Mr Abbott made earlier in the day about the tent embassy.
"Once she was told that, she was also told Mr Abbott was across the road, 'maybe you can give them a bit of a liven up'," the 2GB presenter told his audience today.
"Barbara Shaw then went on stage and for all intents and purposes, incited people."
Apparently, this hasn't been confirmed. Still, considering what the scum-sucking sleaze merchants of Labor regularly get up to, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Well, whoever was ultimately responsible for things getting out of thand, and whether the AFP did overreact as some believe, the whole event bordered on the surreal.
Then there was Gillard's missing shoe. Couldn't help thinking it had a fairy tale quality to it. And others picked up on that Cinderella parallel -- including the very protestor who picked up the shoe!
As Ms Gillard was rushed from a Canberra restaurant yesterday after being trapped inside with the Opposition leader, Tony Abbott, for more than 20 minutes, her right Midas low-rise wedge shoe was lost in the melee.
It was found later by a protester who gleefully raised it above her head and cried, "Gingerella, come get your shoe."
While her actions were downright disgraceful, you have to give this person a coupla cool points for wit and timing. The ABC should hire her post-haste as a comedy writer. Not only would the choice be perfectly PC, but she's clearly far more talented than most of those already employed in that department. (Don't believe me? Watch any episode of The Hamster Wheel, Spicks and Specks or In Gordon St Tonight.)
But back to the shoe: The fact that it was a "Midas" was also weirdly apposite. Gillard's reign has been so disastrous, the woman clearly has a reverse Midas touch. Hell, anything she gets anywhere near rapidly turns to poo. If she does get the footwear item back, I wouldn't be surprised if she finds a dog turd stuck to the heel.
And as to whether it is returned: Looks like it won't be. If it is sold on eBay as planned then this will show not just how mean spirited and opposed to true reconciliation the protestors actually are; it will also take Gillard's credibility down to a new low. I mean, imagine being a nation's leader, having your shoe nicked and not having the nerve and authority to get the bloody thing back?
You couldn't get any piss-weaker if you tried.
UPDATE: Kidnapped shoe returned to its traditional owner. Those advocating for footwear rights will be glad that justice has been served. (Not sure if the dog poo's been wiped off it, but.)
Then there was the role of the media ... Basically Abbott made some quite reasonable remarks about the Tent Embassy. Shameless lefty hacks beat them up. It also looks like there might have been some very slimy tactics from within the PM's office itself:
Sydney radio presenter Ray Hadley today said he'd received information that Ms Shaw or another protester had received a call from a Gillard staffer about comments Mr Abbott made earlier in the day about the tent embassy.
"Once she was told that, she was also told Mr Abbott was across the road, 'maybe you can give them a bit of a liven up'," the 2GB presenter told his audience today.
"Barbara Shaw then went on stage and for all intents and purposes, incited people."
Apparently, this hasn't been confirmed. Still, considering what the scum-sucking sleaze merchants of Labor regularly get up to, I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Well, whoever was ultimately responsible for things getting out of thand, and whether the AFP did overreact as some believe, the whole event bordered on the surreal.
Then there was Gillard's missing shoe. Couldn't help thinking it had a fairy tale quality to it. And others picked up on that Cinderella parallel -- including the very protestor who picked up the shoe!
As Ms Gillard was rushed from a Canberra restaurant yesterday after being trapped inside with the Opposition leader, Tony Abbott, for more than 20 minutes, her right Midas low-rise wedge shoe was lost in the melee.
It was found later by a protester who gleefully raised it above her head and cried, "Gingerella, come get your shoe."
While her actions were downright disgraceful, you have to give this person a coupla cool points for wit and timing. The ABC should hire her post-haste as a comedy writer. Not only would the choice be perfectly PC, but she's clearly far more talented than most of those already employed in that department. (Don't believe me? Watch any episode of The Hamster Wheel, Spicks and Specks or In Gordon St Tonight.)
But back to the shoe: The fact that it was a "Midas" was also weirdly apposite. Gillard's reign has been so disastrous, the woman clearly has a reverse Midas touch. Hell, anything she gets anywhere near rapidly turns to poo. If she does get the footwear item back, I wouldn't be surprised if she finds a dog turd stuck to the heel.
And as to whether it is returned: Looks like it won't be. If it is sold on eBay as planned then this will show not just how mean spirited and opposed to true reconciliation the protestors actually are; it will also take Gillard's credibility down to a new low. I mean, imagine being a nation's leader, having your shoe nicked and not having the nerve and authority to get the bloody thing back?
You couldn't get any piss-weaker if you tried.
UPDATE: Kidnapped shoe returned to its traditional owner. Those advocating for footwear rights will be glad that justice has been served. (Not sure if the dog poo's been wiped off it, but.)
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Homophobia, gay marriage and mental illness
Just a couple more thoughts on this gay marriage issue: I remember seeing a profile of Dr Kerryn Phelps on the teev several years ago. Can't recall what current affairs show it was on, or even the channel. But there was one scene that I remember clearly.
In it, Phelps was lecturing to a group of students or activists. She was fired up, passionately condemning discrimination against gays and lesbians. Now, I can't be sure of her exact words. But they were something along these lines: "Make no mistake: Homophobia is a kind of mental illness." (Now, if she's never said anything like that, I'm happy to withdraw, Mr Speaker. But even if she hadn't, the points I'm making in this post still hold.)
That speech from Phelps stood out for me. At the time I thought her sentiments were pretty extreme. Sure, homophobia isn't nice. But how do you define it? And if it is a mental illness how do you diagnose it -- or cure it, for that matter? These are valid questions because the views Phelps expressed seem to be gaining ground in psychiatry.
Sadly, homophobia is just one kind of prejudice. And humans are capable of a whole range of 'em. Is sexism a mental illness? I'm sure that plenty of feminists would say that misogyny is. But if you define misogyny as a mental illness, then surely misandry is as well. And, let's face it, a lot of lesbians do seem to have a deep hatred of men. So, that would make them mentally ill as well, wouldn't it?
See the problem? If you go down this mental illness route you can pathologize pretty much any group you like.
Right now this is even more problematic. This is because accusations of homophobia are being leveled not just at people who hate gays, but also at those who simply disagree with the idea of gay marriage. Take this column, by Carlos A Ball. The conclusion reads:
Nonetheless, after marriage equality opponents have failed for twenty years to articulate rational arguments for their opposition to gay marriages, it is becoming less plausible to contend that such an opposition is not, at some level, grounded in homophobia.
Now, if this argument gains more ground and starts to have legal force it will have huge ramifications for society, won't it? Even if the most optimistic claims by gay marriage advocates are correct, and most people are okay with the idea, that still leaves a sizeable minority who are not. Even in Australia, that would mean several million people would be classified as mentally ill.
Now, that's gotta be the biggest, most spectacular example of "political correctness gone mad!" we've seen so far. Or it's the grandest, most audacious act of disease mongering ever attempted. (There's a new one for the conspiracy lovers: Maybe the big drug companies have hijacked the gay rights movement in order to quadruple their profits?)
Well, whichever way you look at it, it's a doozy.
In it, Phelps was lecturing to a group of students or activists. She was fired up, passionately condemning discrimination against gays and lesbians. Now, I can't be sure of her exact words. But they were something along these lines: "Make no mistake: Homophobia is a kind of mental illness." (Now, if she's never said anything like that, I'm happy to withdraw, Mr Speaker. But even if she hadn't, the points I'm making in this post still hold.)
That speech from Phelps stood out for me. At the time I thought her sentiments were pretty extreme. Sure, homophobia isn't nice. But how do you define it? And if it is a mental illness how do you diagnose it -- or cure it, for that matter? These are valid questions because the views Phelps expressed seem to be gaining ground in psychiatry.
Sadly, homophobia is just one kind of prejudice. And humans are capable of a whole range of 'em. Is sexism a mental illness? I'm sure that plenty of feminists would say that misogyny is. But if you define misogyny as a mental illness, then surely misandry is as well. And, let's face it, a lot of lesbians do seem to have a deep hatred of men. So, that would make them mentally ill as well, wouldn't it?
See the problem? If you go down this mental illness route you can pathologize pretty much any group you like.
Right now this is even more problematic. This is because accusations of homophobia are being leveled not just at people who hate gays, but also at those who simply disagree with the idea of gay marriage. Take this column, by Carlos A Ball. The conclusion reads:
Nonetheless, after marriage equality opponents have failed for twenty years to articulate rational arguments for their opposition to gay marriages, it is becoming less plausible to contend that such an opposition is not, at some level, grounded in homophobia.
Now, if this argument gains more ground and starts to have legal force it will have huge ramifications for society, won't it? Even if the most optimistic claims by gay marriage advocates are correct, and most people are okay with the idea, that still leaves a sizeable minority who are not. Even in Australia, that would mean several million people would be classified as mentally ill.
Now, that's gotta be the biggest, most spectacular example of "political correctness gone mad!" we've seen so far. Or it's the grandest, most audacious act of disease mongering ever attempted. (There's a new one for the conspiracy lovers: Maybe the big drug companies have hijacked the gay rights movement in order to quadruple their profits?)
Well, whichever way you look at it, it's a doozy.
Friday, January 20, 2012
Billie Jean King defends Margaret Court in Melbourne Park stoush
The reaction from gay rights activists to Margaret Court's comments about homosexuality is way over the top. I find her theories about how gays can be "cured" balmy and deserving of condemnation. I also don't agree with her description of homosexuality as involving "abominable sexual practices".
But her attitude to gay marriage is not exactly a fringe position. The idea that marriage can only be between a man and a woman has been pretty much standard across all cultures for thousands of years, and remains so. She seems extreme because petulant, shrieking gay rights zealots have done such a good job of intimidating those who don't toe their PC line. Almost everyone in Australia is terrified to defend what the majority of people privately believe and have done so for yonks! Margaret Court isn't and good on her for that.
Clearly, ideological bullies like Dr Kerryn Phelps would be happy if Ms Court never uttered another word on the matter. But they should be careful what they wish for. What would they have to bitch about then, eh? That's always a problem for the intolerant ideologue. When their demands are met they have to ratchet them up even more.
Which has happened with this issue already, come to think of it. This is primarily about gay marriage, remember. Not so long ago, it wasn't that big an issue even in the gay community -- let alone the rest of society. But now you're viciously denounced as homophobic if you don't approve of it. This makes no sense at all. What about out and proud gays who don't support the idea (they do exist, you know). Are they homophobic, too?
Hearteningly, Court has a defender from the, er, other side of the net. Proud lesbian and former tennis champ Billie Jean King has eloquently aced Court's detractors with a blistering serve (sorry readers, they were there, I had to take them).
King rejects Court's views on homosexuality and gay marriage. However, she is equally angered at the suggestion made by Kerryn Phelps that Tennis Australia should consider renaming Margaret Court Arena.
"Get rid of her for that? Because you don't agree with her? Are you kidding?" King told the Desert Sun newspaper in Palm Springs, California. "Just because you don't agree with someone? Please. She deserves it.
Spot on.
Court was one of the greatest athletes this country has produced. Doesn't matter what her views are. Her record stands.
Hell, if you're gonna demand that any prominent citizen with non-PC views should not be publicly remembered then you'd have to rename half the buildings and streets in every city, as well as tear down a whole mess o' bloody great statues. While Phelps' demands are hardly, er, Pol Pot-esque, you can't help being a little alarmed at the ferocity of her desire to erase some of the evidence of this great sportswoman's achievements.
But her attitude to gay marriage is not exactly a fringe position. The idea that marriage can only be between a man and a woman has been pretty much standard across all cultures for thousands of years, and remains so. She seems extreme because petulant, shrieking gay rights zealots have done such a good job of intimidating those who don't toe their PC line. Almost everyone in Australia is terrified to defend what the majority of people privately believe and have done so for yonks! Margaret Court isn't and good on her for that.
Clearly, ideological bullies like Dr Kerryn Phelps would be happy if Ms Court never uttered another word on the matter. But they should be careful what they wish for. What would they have to bitch about then, eh? That's always a problem for the intolerant ideologue. When their demands are met they have to ratchet them up even more.
Which has happened with this issue already, come to think of it. This is primarily about gay marriage, remember. Not so long ago, it wasn't that big an issue even in the gay community -- let alone the rest of society. But now you're viciously denounced as homophobic if you don't approve of it. This makes no sense at all. What about out and proud gays who don't support the idea (they do exist, you know). Are they homophobic, too?
Hearteningly, Court has a defender from the, er, other side of the net. Proud lesbian and former tennis champ Billie Jean King has eloquently aced Court's detractors with a blistering serve (sorry readers, they were there, I had to take them).
King rejects Court's views on homosexuality and gay marriage. However, she is equally angered at the suggestion made by Kerryn Phelps that Tennis Australia should consider renaming Margaret Court Arena.
"Get rid of her for that? Because you don't agree with her? Are you kidding?" King told the Desert Sun newspaper in Palm Springs, California. "Just because you don't agree with someone? Please. She deserves it.
Spot on.
Court was one of the greatest athletes this country has produced. Doesn't matter what her views are. Her record stands.
Hell, if you're gonna demand that any prominent citizen with non-PC views should not be publicly remembered then you'd have to rename half the buildings and streets in every city, as well as tear down a whole mess o' bloody great statues. While Phelps' demands are hardly, er, Pol Pot-esque, you can't help being a little alarmed at the ferocity of her desire to erase some of the evidence of this great sportswoman's achievements.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Greens weep for trees in Charles Riley Memorial Reserve
Here's another case of ferndamentalist quarterwits getting all bolshie about trees being felled within the Perth city boundaries. Just a week and a half after playing silly buggers in Manning, they're now all asquitter about plans to give 47 trees the chop at Charles Riley Memorial Reserve in North Beach.
When you think just how huge this state is, and also how much forest there is down south and even up in the hills outside this city, this activism seems very silly indeed. Anyway, Perth itself is hardly lacking in pleasant wooded areas.
But nup. They've just got to bitch about every little thing, don't they? I suspect they're quite relieved that they can moan and sulk about tree felling in the "urban forest" because they all live close to the CBD anyway. They have much less further to travel to demos, and can get back to their creature comforts quickly. Roughing it in tents out in the boondocks loses its allure very quickly.
In typically crazy fashion, Greens MP Lynn McLaren said that "birds don't recognize local government boundaries".
What? Does she think they're, like, Australian citizens or something? Is she gonna start agitating for their right to vote?
Anyhow, invoking the welfare of birds is not such a hot idea considering that purportedly planet saving wind turbines so beloved by McLaren and her ilk have been killing the poor critters en masse.
What a tragically deluded fool she is.
When you think just how huge this state is, and also how much forest there is down south and even up in the hills outside this city, this activism seems very silly indeed. Anyway, Perth itself is hardly lacking in pleasant wooded areas.
But nup. They've just got to bitch about every little thing, don't they? I suspect they're quite relieved that they can moan and sulk about tree felling in the "urban forest" because they all live close to the CBD anyway. They have much less further to travel to demos, and can get back to their creature comforts quickly. Roughing it in tents out in the boondocks loses its allure very quickly.
In typically crazy fashion, Greens MP Lynn McLaren said that "birds don't recognize local government boundaries".
What? Does she think they're, like, Australian citizens or something? Is she gonna start agitating for their right to vote?
Anyhow, invoking the welfare of birds is not such a hot idea considering that purportedly planet saving wind turbines so beloved by McLaren and her ilk have been killing the poor critters en masse.
What a tragically deluded fool she is.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Gillard right. Anti-whaling activists irresponsible, not heroic
Gawd but the deep green, anti-whaling Left are a tragically infantile bunch. The poor little poppets are so utterly lost they believe that if you do something both stupid and politically pointless that puts good diplomatic relations at risk and requires the redirection over many miles of a large vessel at considerable cost to the taxpayer then you're not just cool -- you're a dinkum hero! (Check out the photo in this story.)
Heroes? No way. Spoiled brats, more like.
Please kids, you're middle aged. Grow up before it's too late. Sure, there may well have been a time when extreme acts against rogue whalers were justified. And there's no denying that zooming in front of bloody great loaded harpoons in little rubber dinghies certainly took some balls. But boarding a boat illegally under the cover of darkness was not nearly so risky. Risking a few scratches from razor wire? Piss-weak as! No guys, your glory days are well behind you. Now you're just annoying. Even Julia Gillard knows that.
While there is widespread revulsion at the activities of the Japanese whalers, more and more people are tiring of these silly anti-whaling antics. Hell, this sentiment may well even be spreading into the activist community itself, if this quote from the significant other of one of the recently returned moonbats is any guide:
"You never know what is going to happen when they do something like this," Mr Peterffy's partner Panda Broad said. "People are saying you've got to give him a kick up the backside when he gets home but I am so proud of him."
Who are these people? If they share Peterffy's views but abhor his actions then that is a very good sign indeed.
But Panda? She really shouldn't encourage Special Boy so. He'll just go and do it all over again.
(Sister, if you wanna wield some real feminine power, remember this: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. If you spare the rod you spoil the child. Still applies even if the child in question is pushin' fifty!)
Heroes? No way. Spoiled brats, more like.
Please kids, you're middle aged. Grow up before it's too late. Sure, there may well have been a time when extreme acts against rogue whalers were justified. And there's no denying that zooming in front of bloody great loaded harpoons in little rubber dinghies certainly took some balls. But boarding a boat illegally under the cover of darkness was not nearly so risky. Risking a few scratches from razor wire? Piss-weak as! No guys, your glory days are well behind you. Now you're just annoying. Even Julia Gillard knows that.
While there is widespread revulsion at the activities of the Japanese whalers, more and more people are tiring of these silly anti-whaling antics. Hell, this sentiment may well even be spreading into the activist community itself, if this quote from the significant other of one of the recently returned moonbats is any guide:
"You never know what is going to happen when they do something like this," Mr Peterffy's partner Panda Broad said. "People are saying you've got to give him a kick up the backside when he gets home but I am so proud of him."
Who are these people? If they share Peterffy's views but abhor his actions then that is a very good sign indeed.
But Panda? She really shouldn't encourage Special Boy so. He'll just go and do it all over again.
(Sister, if you wanna wield some real feminine power, remember this: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. If you spare the rod you spoil the child. Still applies even if the child in question is pushin' fifty!)
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Anti-whaling idiots unpunished; their group's racism not condemned
The three stooges from Forest Rescue Australia who illegally boarded the Shonan Maru 2 have been released. This completely discredits these nasty insinuations, made when the morons were first captured:
"We assume they have been taken prisoner by the Japanese and historically this has not been a good situation to be in," a spokesman for Forest Rescue told The West Australian this morning.
I doubt very much he was referring specifically to that nation's prior treatment of anti-whaling activists. Kiwi lunatic Pete Bethune, for example, got off very lightly. It seems very likely that he was slyly alluding to Japan's record of wartime atrocities. Just goes to show that you can be racist if you are greenie and never be condemned for it by the compassionistas of the mainstream meeja. Imagine the reaction if a spokesman for, say, the IPA had said such a thing.
So once again the ferndies pull off another utterly ridiculous and completely pointless publicity stunt and get away with it entirely. And the long suffering Aussie taxpayer has to foot the bill.
"We assume they have been taken prisoner by the Japanese and historically this has not been a good situation to be in," a spokesman for Forest Rescue told The West Australian this morning.
I doubt very much he was referring specifically to that nation's prior treatment of anti-whaling activists. Kiwi lunatic Pete Bethune, for example, got off very lightly. It seems very likely that he was slyly alluding to Japan's record of wartime atrocities. Just goes to show that you can be racist if you are greenie and never be condemned for it by the compassionistas of the mainstream meeja. Imagine the reaction if a spokesman for, say, the IPA had said such a thing.
So once again the ferndies pull off another utterly ridiculous and completely pointless publicity stunt and get away with it entirely. And the long suffering Aussie taxpayer has to foot the bill.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Tuxworth, Pendlebury, Peterffy should pay back the money they wasted
Geoffrey Tuxworth, Glen Pendlebury, and Simon Peterffy have gotta be the biggest bunch o' bozos since Larry, Curly and Moe. And at least those guys were funny!
By invading the Japanese vessel the Shonan Maru 2 the three stooges have done absolutely no good whatsoever for their purported cause of saving the whales. On the contrary, they've almost certainly set it back quite a bit.
Hell, even Julia Gillard could see the folly in it:
"The conduct of these three Australians in my view is unacceptable - engaging in illegal activity," she said.
"I feel very strongly about whaling... I know many Australians rightly do.
"But we are taking the most effective action we can against whaling through the International Court of Justice."
Now when the most gutless, aimless and shameless PM in the nation's history actually starts making sense and articulating the public mood, well, you've really hit a new low.
Not only did the stupidly provocative act further annoy the Japanese and make them more likely to remain defiant, the long suffering Aussie taxpayer now has to foot the hefty bill for the retrieval of this trio of meatheads. At the very least they should be made to cough it up themselves.
By invading the Japanese vessel the Shonan Maru 2 the three stooges have done absolutely no good whatsoever for their purported cause of saving the whales. On the contrary, they've almost certainly set it back quite a bit.
Hell, even Julia Gillard could see the folly in it:
"The conduct of these three Australians in my view is unacceptable - engaging in illegal activity," she said.
"I feel very strongly about whaling... I know many Australians rightly do.
"But we are taking the most effective action we can against whaling through the International Court of Justice."
Now when the most gutless, aimless and shameless PM in the nation's history actually starts making sense and articulating the public mood, well, you've really hit a new low.
Not only did the stupidly provocative act further annoy the Japanese and make them more likely to remain defiant, the long suffering Aussie taxpayer now has to foot the hefty bill for the retrieval of this trio of meatheads. At the very least they should be made to cough it up themselves.
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Fools from Forest Rescue Australia deserve their Japanese punishment
One favourite tactic of extreme left-wing and deep green activists is to keep provoking their enemies relentlessly until they have to react somehow, then squealing with indignation when it happens. This so-called "hostage" situation on the Shonan Maru No 2 is a good example.
Three idiots from the group Forest Rescue Australia boarded the Japanese whaling vessel in the night and were captured by the crew. Obviously they were going to be held as a result. What did they expect -- some sushi and sake and a warm farewell the next morning?
Paul Watson showed amazing gall in interpreting the quite understandable reaction of the Japanese as something way out of line:
Captain Watson said the activists had showed incredible daring to clamber aboard the Japanese vessel, as it was brimming with barbed wire and other devices designed to deter unwelcome boarders.
These people are behaving like spoiled brats. I don't give a tinker's what happens to them. And I think a lot of people who were sympathetic to their cause are rapidly becoming less so because of antics like this.
Three idiots from the group Forest Rescue Australia boarded the Japanese whaling vessel in the night and were captured by the crew. Obviously they were going to be held as a result. What did they expect -- some sushi and sake and a warm farewell the next morning?
Paul Watson showed amazing gall in interpreting the quite understandable reaction of the Japanese as something way out of line:
Captain Watson said the activists had showed incredible daring to clamber aboard the Japanese vessel, as it was brimming with barbed wire and other devices designed to deter unwelcome boarders.
These people are behaving like spoiled brats. I don't give a tinker's what happens to them. And I think a lot of people who were sympathetic to their cause are rapidly becoming less so because of antics like this.
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Police arrest cockatoo-loving moonbats in Manning
A sure sign of the sheer madness of the deep green ferndamentalist movement (if there weren't enough already!) is how often they make nuisances of themselves in urban areas. I mean, it's one thing to protest about destruction of native flora and fauna out in the boondocks, but a stone's throw from the CBD? You've got to be joking. But they're not, of course ...
Not long ago a team of shrieking doctors' wives made a ruckus outside Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (which must have been embarrassing for some of their husbands working within it). Now, across the Swan River some dirty, smelly hippies have been arrested for chaining themselves to cherry pickers in Bentley Rd, Manning.
These people are clearly insane. Still, while their actions make no rational sense whatsoever, there does seem to be a strange consistency to them. That is that they were trying to save the black cockatoo (which hasn't been found nesting there, by the way). Kind of appropriate for a bunch of bloody galahs.
Not long ago a team of shrieking doctors' wives made a ruckus outside Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (which must have been embarrassing for some of their husbands working within it). Now, across the Swan River some dirty, smelly hippies have been arrested for chaining themselves to cherry pickers in Bentley Rd, Manning.
These people are clearly insane. Still, while their actions make no rational sense whatsoever, there does seem to be a strange consistency to them. That is that they were trying to save the black cockatoo (which hasn't been found nesting there, by the way). Kind of appropriate for a bunch of bloody galahs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)