Saturday, December 21, 2013

Van Badham vs Tim Blair

Gawd. I've seen a lot of infantile, egocentric behaviour from the censorious squawkers of Artsville. But one recent reaction has really taken the bloody cake. It comes from nascent socialist squealebrity Van Badham.

Appalled and offended that she's been mocked by Tim Blair for a grotesquely self-indulgent anti-Abbott rant in which she included details about her late father's unseemly behaviour while he was unemployed, she tweeted this to one of her fellow sneering hipsters.
It's called a fair crack, Vanessa.

It could also be said that using your dad's death to score cheap points against your main political hate figure constitutes an insult to his memory. We've all got dead relatives and loved ones. But only the most shameless and selfish use their deaths to slime those they detest -- and so soon after their passing. (It's not unlike Bolt-obsessed bloviator Mike Carlton and others like him using the death of Nelson Mandela to slime conservatives.)

Then there's the sheer irony of the potty-mouthed termagant demanding that everyone bow in sympathy to her fine feelings and respect her in her grief. Just take a look at the petulant princess's Twitter stream and you'll see what I mean. You'll be picking your jaw up off the floor.

She's gotta be one of the most abusive lefties on the site -- and that's saying something. She goes out of her way to provoke and offend people, verballing them at every opportunity.

Is it because she's as batshit insane as she appears to be, or is it just a cynical ploy? Maybe even a bit of both ...

She's certainly cottoned onto the fact that to carve a niche in the the leftoid media too much vile abuse is just never enough. As well as endless adulation from absolute idiots, there are well-paying meeja gigs and grants galore to be had if you can out-crazy your fellow feminist moonbats. To the "victim" the spoils!

Vanessa Badham is what I call a blushing violent. Vicious, aggressive, happy to make the most vile and knowingly false accusations when it suits. Then at other times when it suits she hides behind her gender, and plays victim. It's an amazingly cynical tactic. And sooo typical of the primitive, vindictive, cowardly Left.

My advice to the spoiled brat: Listen, baby cakes, if you don't wanna be mocked because you're still grieving then don't put that sensitive info into the public realm -- let alone for the purpose of a mean-spirited sliming.

Frankly petal, your feelings aren't that important. You show no respect for the feelings of others, so why should they respect yours? You were askin' for it.

33 comments:

  1. Nice one mate. About time someone called this duplicitous Daddy's little princess out. And those like her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If she was a bloke you'd call her a wanker. As she is allegedly female I'll defer to someone more qualified for the appropriate label.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not necessarily qualified but your description seems perfectly apt. Just run with it.

      Delete
    2. That's pretty sexist David. Women make perfectly good wankers.

      Delete
    3. Sorry about that Nonny. You are absolutely right. :-)

      Delete
    4. Princess Petal DaisycakesDecember 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM

      Wanker would be appropriate. But termagant, princess, petal...??

      Are you actually going for Sexist of the Day award?
      Van Badham (amazing name!) deserves some criticism. But these names - nope, don't make a good impression on me at all.

      Delete
    5. No I think she is some kind of transexual.
      Sue here ass off.

      Delete
  3. Good call Matt. The whole thrown toasty incident was what you expect from a privileged white women desperate to be able to find a way to be classed a victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, presenting herself as the wronged one in every situation is her favourite tactic. She's taken it to an almost zen-like level!

      Delete
    2. She must learn the difference between "being wronged" and being WRONG" . One of them she has down pat, the other not so much as far as I can tell ;-)

      Delete
  4. Excellent call, Matt, and the best retort yet. Blair should quote you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I had to look up "termagant". My new favorite word, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No worries. I'm also quite fond of gorgon, harpy and banshee ... not to mention succubus.

      Delete
    2. All four of those can be found in the World of Warcraft. Along with female orcs, trolls, ogres, demons, forsaken, dragons... she'd fit right in.

      Delete
  6. Sadly, she is all too typical of a certain type of feminist. And I was right about the daddy issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there are many other women like her. It's quite depressing.

      While they are intensely annoying, they are also very sad. They've confused petty viciousness against those too meek or polite to bite back with empowerment. They think of themselves as sassy, feisty fighters, but they're basically just professional nags.

      Delete
    2. Hey, if all else fails they can always cry about it and then ask a chivalrous man to beat the insulting guy up on their behalf.

      Delete
  7. Typical low class-Socialist; drag the cheap coat tails of tacky public mourning for bad form reasons, then loudly wail when they are rightfully stomped on by everyone who calls her bluff. A bogan



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not unlike the bogan queen herself, Julia Gillard.

      Delete
  8. Oh Good one!
    All I wanted to say but was too ladylike to commit to paper, well done Matt!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nicely said. They can hand it out but don't like being on the receiving end.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Van Badham is a typical leftie who has to rely on personal abuse in lieu of an ability to write logical, cogent, rational criticisms of her "opponents". She sees reality through the prism of the far-left mindset. On the bell curve of rationality she lies in the three standard deviation band on the negative side. Similarly when it comes to emotional intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, she strikes me as having a very low "EQ". That's ironic considering her experience as a playwright.

      I've never seen or read any of her plays, but considering how relentlessly abusive she is on social media etc, I'll bet they are just your typical tub-thumping fair. You know, primitive illustrations of the limitless compassion of salt of the earth lefties and the sadistic brutality of eeevil conservatives. No complex characters; just cardboard cut-outs.

      Delete
  11. "On the bell curve of rationality she lies in the three standard deviation band on the negative side"

    Gold Nonny, just Gold. I'll file that in my "do not forgettery' for future use - suitably acknowledging the source of course.

    ReplyDelete
  12. She has put in a rails run for worst post of 2013.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I guess it may be too high "EI" or "IQ" to highlight that the article, by "buying into her rant" is nothing more than the eloquent flip side of the same coin...

    Too hard to get?

    ReplyDelete
  14. try to debate her?
    You are banned!
    Took down her own site.
    This vile Commie troll.
    Ever noticed that fat girls gravitate to the left?
    Must be a physics thing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What the fuck?

      Delete
    2. Don't agree with the original blogger, but you & your cronies are way out of line

      Delete
  15. Unattractive women, nowadays especially, are angry women. Instead of making the best of things and being nice, which would get them noticed, they simply get angry to get noticed. And to whom do they vent their anger, who else is there but men. Their narcissism has them emotionally crippled, and therefore incapable of improving themselves - too hard by far. So they take the easy option; have a cake and slag off the male gender and evil patriarchy.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I just discovered this "novelist/ playwright" when I joined Twitter to have my two cents over the election.She is followed by Paul Keating, although judging by the paltry level of incisive wit to be found in his tweets, I suspect he has a ghost tweeter/ twitterer, in fact, judging by the asinine observations made therein, that may well be her.
    The sheer volume of her "theatrical output" I am certain is in converse proportion to the quality of it, and proves the great Polonius yet again correct. Wit being brief.
    Summarising, I could not help but find the vulgarity of her attention seeking vitriol and lack of balanced insight another reason why I feel that all Fabian degenerates should be excommunicated from this plane of existence��
    Boudiccanesque at large...

    ReplyDelete
  17. She proves Hoffer's maxim that "rudeness is a weak man's (or woman's) imitation of strength".

    ReplyDelete